Is Rudrakshum Residency registered with MahaRERA?

Yes. It is registered as P52100066464, filed on 11 June 2024, and the registration is current. The authority's own record is the place to confirm that; this page restates it.

When is Rudrakshum Residency due to be handed over?

The promoter has told MahaRERA July 2028. That is a declaration to the authority rather than a promise to a buyer; the date in your own agreement is the one that binds.

Has Rudrakshum Residency been delayed?

Yes. The first date filed was March 2026. It now stands at July 2028, 2.3 years later.

What did buyers actually pay in Rudrakshum Residency?

A median of ₹8,234 per square foot of carpet, across 7 sale agreements registered in this project. That is what was paid and stamped, not what is being asked.

How many units are left in Rudrakshum Residency?

8 of 19 were still unsold at the promoter's last filing, in 2 BHK, from 811–853 sq ft of carpet.

Are there complaints against Rudrakshum Residency?

None appear against this project in the register. That covers cases filed with MahaRERA, and nothing about disputes settled elsewhere or never filed.

Who is building Rudrakshum Residency?

Rudrakshum Constructions Private Limited, as the promoter named on the registration.

RERA registered P52100066464 Active

Rudrakshum Residency

Viman Nagar, Pune · Others by Rudrakshum Constructions Private Limited

Official record Updated from the register 24 September 2026. Anything filed since then is not here yet.

In short

Rudrakshum Residency in Viman Nagar is MahaRERA-registered (P52100066464) and still under construction, with possession filed for July 2028. Buyers have already registered 7 sales here at a median ₹8,234 per sq ft of carpet — not an asking price. About 58% of the 19 units are sold. Rudrakshum Constructions Private Limited is the promoter.

Stock image, not a photograph of Rudrakshum Residency — A stock photograph, not Rudrakshum Residency. We have no picture of this site yet.

Where this is

Viman Nagar, PMC, Pune, 411014

Taluka: Haveli
Pincode: 411014
Coordinates: 18.335698, 73.564630

Open in Maps Get directions Search Maps by name instead

The coordinates are the promoter's own, filed with MahaRERA. We have not checked them on the ground, and a filed pin is occasionally a few kilometres from the survey number on the same filing — if it does not look right, search by name.

Unit sizes on file

All 19 units are filed unit by unit with the authority, the highest on floor 3. Sizes are RERA carpet area — the floor you can actually walk on, not a built-up or saleable figure. The register holds them in square metres, so that figure is printed under each one: it is what you will see if you open the filing, and the square feet are our arithmetic on it.

1 BHK 3 units · all sold

3 units 425 sq ft 39.49 sq m as filed

2 BHK 12 units · 8 available

3 units 811 sq ft 75.36 sq m as filed

3 units 823 sq ft 76.45 sq m as filed

3 units 828 sq ft 76.89 sq m as filed

3 units 853 sq ft 79.28 sq m as filed

Shops 4 units · all sold

2 units 314 sq ft 29.17 sq m as filed

1 unit 326 sq ft 30.28 sq m as filed

1 unit 346 sq ft 32.19 sq m as filed

Units sold

11 / 19

Selling steadily

58% absorption rate

Visual area guide See what the filed sizes feel like 2 generic footprints scaled from the registered carpet areas.

What each size looks like

Generic layouts, not this project's plans. Only the carpet area is from the register — the rooms are the usual shares of a unit that size, and where the promoter actually put the kitchen or which way the balcony faces is not filed anywhere. Read them for scale, which is the part that is arithmetic on the register: each room is drawn to its share of the area filed for that unit, and each unit to its size against the largest one drawn below.

1 BHK 3 units · none available

425 sq ft carpet as drawn

Carpet, filed: 425 sq ft
Built-up: about 510 sq ft
Super built-up: about 595 sq ft

Every room in this unit

Living and dining about 159 sq ft, Master bedroom about 106 sq ft, Kitchen about 64 sq ft, Bath about 37 sq ft, Balcony about 37 sq ft, Passage about 21 sq ft.

2 BHK 12 units · 8 available

811 sq ft carpet as drawn, from 811–853 sq ft filed in this configuration

Carpet, filed: 811 sq ft
Built-up: about 973 sq ft
Super built-up: about 1,135 sq ft

Every room in this unit

Living and dining about 236 sq ft, Master bedroom about 157 sq ft, Second bedroom about 126 sq ft, Kitchen about 94 sq ft, Bath about 55 sq ft, Balcony about 55 sq ft, Second bath about 47 sq ft, Passage about 39 sq ft.

The built-up and super built-up figures are ours, not the promoter's: carpet plus 20% and plus 40%, which is the usual Pune loading. A promoter can load more, and the number they quote is the one to check against the agreement. Which of the three you are actually buying, and why the register only records one of them, is in our guide to carpet against super built-up area.

What buyers actually paid

₹8,234 per sq ft of carpet, median of 7 registered sales

Range across those sales	₹7,339 to ₹10,000 per sq ft
Sold and booked	11 sold, 0 booked
Still available	8 units, 314–853 sq ft

A registered price is what a buyer contracted to pay, so it is the closest thing to a real number this market produces. It still is not a quote for you: these agreements were signed on different dates as the project progressed, floor and facing move the rate, and what a builder asks today may be higher or lower. Unsold units carry a government ready-reckoner valuation instead of a price, and that is a different thing, so it is not mixed into the figures above.

Timeline audit

Original proposed Mar 2026

Current status Due Jul 2028

Revised projection

The completion date has moved from March 2026 to July 2028, 2.3 years later, on the promoter's own revised filing.

Under section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, a buyer whose possession is delayed beyond the date in the agreement may withdraw and claim a refund with interest, or stay and claim interest for every month of delay. That right attaches to the date in your agreement, not the date on this page.

Deep due diligence Open the complete registry dossier Land, promoter, complaints, title papers, plans and the raw MahaRERA record.

The land itself

SURVEY NO. 55/2/45 is the plot this project is built on, as filed

Street, as filed	Kharadi Lohgaon Road
Bounded north by	Kharadi Lohgaon Boundary and Sanjay Pailwan Proper
Bounded east by	9 mtr road
Bounded south by	15 ft common access road
Bounded west by	Property of Shri Devkar

Every promoter has to file the survey numbers of the land and what lies on each of its four sides. It is the driest thing on this page and the most useful if you are serious: the survey number is what the revenue record is keyed on, so it is what you quote to check the seven-twelve extract, and the boundaries are how you confirm on site that the plot you were shown is the plot that was registered.

"Street" is the register's own field name and promoters fill it with whatever they have — a road, a locality, sometimes the survey numbers again. It is printed as filed rather than tidied up.

Who is behind this project

Filed by the promoter with MahaRERA.

Promoter on the register	Rudrakshum Constructions Private Limited
Registered office	201, 82/1, Suman Ankur Building, Baner, Sahyadri Farm, Sahyadri Farm, Ground, Pune 411045

Professionals named on the filing

Architect	Design Genesis Studio 46030
Engineer	Amal Jalindar Nagargoje PWD reg no. U3CSBRI5HG
Engineer	Rahul Patil STATE/R/2022/APL/01954
Chartered Accountant	K Y M & & Associates 179963
Chartered Accountant	V. S. Fathepur & Co 129421

The promoter appoints these, and MahaRERA requires the architect and engineer to certify progress before money can be drawn from the project account. A name that recurs across several of a builder's projects is normal; one that recurs across several lapsed ones is worth a question.

Title and ownership papers

25 May 2024 is when an advocate last certified the title to this land

Title report Title Report.pdf	25 May 2024
Promoter's declaration, Form B 1 - Form B.pdf	25 May 2024 1 older version on file

No project reaches the register without an advocate's report on the title to its land, so a title report on file is the floor and not a distinction. What the date tells you is how recently somebody qualified looked. What none of it tells you is whether the title is clear: a report can record an objection, a pending suit or a missing consent and still be a perfectly valid filing, and nothing here reads the contents of the document.

So read it yourself before you pay a booking amount, and read the newest one. Every document above is on the authority's page for this project, under the filename shown — the link is in Check this yourself. What to look for in each one, and what having it on file does not prove, is set out in our guide to a project's title papers.

RERA filing records

View all

Every figure here is the authority's, not ours, as of the date at the top of this page. This is the raw record, reproduced without alteration.

Field	As filed with MahaRERA
Registration number	P52100066464
Promoter	Rudrakshum Constructions Private Limited
Project type	Others · Building development
Locality	Viman Nagar — Haveli taluka, pincode 411014
Applied on	25 May 2024
Registered on	11 June 2024
Completion, as first filed	31 March 2026
Due	31 July 2028 2.3 years later
Units declared	19
Units sold	11 of 19 sold (58%), 8 still unsold
Complaints	0 on record with MahaRERA
Certificate on file	Extension certificate, issued 19 August 2026
Application reference	REA52100160508
Current status	Active
Record last changed	18 April 2026 · 5 months ago

Where the sold count comes from, and whether it holds up. 11 of 19 is the promoter's own figure, from the quarterly progress report every registered project has to file. Nobody audits that. But they file a second, separate thing with the same authority: the building unit by unit. That list accounts for all 19 units and reaches the same answer — 11 sold, every one with money recorded as received against a named unit, and 8 still unsold. Two filings, made separately, agreeing to the unit. That is not an audit, but it is a good deal harder to fudge than one round number. Either way, this is only as current as the last change to the record, 18 April 2026.

Common questions

Is Rudrakshum Residency registered with MahaRERA?: Yes. It is registered as P52100066464, filed on 11 June 2024, and the registration is current. The authority's own record is the place to confirm that; this page restates it.
When is Rudrakshum Residency due to be handed over?: The promoter has told MahaRERA July 2028. That is a declaration to the authority rather than a promise to a buyer; the date in your own agreement is the one that binds.
Has Rudrakshum Residency been delayed?: Yes. The first date filed was March 2026. It now stands at July 2028, 2.3 years later.
What did buyers actually pay in Rudrakshum Residency?: A median of ₹8,234 per square foot of carpet, across 7 sale agreements registered in this project. That is what was paid and stamped, not what is being asked.
How many units are left in Rudrakshum Residency?: 8 of 19 were still unsold at the promoter's last filing, in 2 BHK, from 811–853 sq ft of carpet.
Are there complaints against Rudrakshum Residency?: None appear against this project in the register. That covers cases filed with MahaRERA, and nothing about disputes settled elsewhere or never filed.
Who is building Rudrakshum Residency?: Rudrakshum Constructions Private Limited, as the promoter named on the registration.

Check this yourself

This page restates one public record as we read it on 24 September 2026. The authority's own page for P52100066464 carries more that we do not republish: the registration certificate, every quarterly progress report, the sanctioned plans, parking allocation, the project bank account, and any declared litigation.

Open on MahaRERA Or search the register

MahaRERA will ask you to type a CAPTCHA first. That is their gate, not a broken link — and it is the reason this page exists, because a register you have to solve a puzzle to read one project at a time is not one anybody comparing four projects will actually use.