Is Luxuria registered with MahaRERA?

It was, as P52100078634, filed on 30 December 2024. That registration has since lapsed. A promoter may not advertise, market or sell in a project whose registration is not current, and a lapse does not by itself say the building has stopped.

When was Luxuria due to be handed over?

August 2026, and that date has passed without a handover being filed — 24 days ago. Section 18 of the Act gives an allottee a remedy when a promoter misses the date in the agreement.

What did buyers actually pay in Luxuria?

A median of ₹5,391 per square foot of carpet, across 10 sale agreements registered in this project. That is what was paid and stamped, not what is being asked.

How many flats are left in Luxuria?

31 of 41 were still unsold at the promoter's last filing, in 2, 3 BHK, from 603–842 sq ft of carpet.

Are there complaints against Luxuria?

None appear against this project in the register. That covers cases filed with MahaRERA, and nothing about disputes settled elsewhere or never filed.

Who is building Luxuria?

Prammukh Associates, as the promoter named on the registration.

Registration ended P52100078634 Lapsed

Luxuria

Talegaon Dabhade, Pune · Residential / Group Housing by Prammukh Associates

Official record Updated from the register 24 September 2026. Anything filed since then is not here yet.

This registration has lapsed. MahaRERA ends a registration when the completion date passes with no extension filed, and that is what has happened here — the date was August 2026. Construction may well be continuing, and a lapse is not a finding against the builder. It does mean the register no longer stands behind the dates and unit counts below, and that the RERA protections you would be buying under are not currently in force. Everything on this page is the promoter's last filing, kept here because it is the record of what was promised.

In short

Luxuria in Talegaon Dabhade was MahaRERA-registered as P52100078634, but that registration has lapsed. Buyers have already registered 10 sales here at a median ₹5,391 per sq ft of carpet — not an asking price. About 24% of the 41 units are sold. Prammukh Associates is the promoter.

Stock image, not a photograph of Luxuria — A stock photograph, not Luxuria. We have no picture of this site yet.

Where this is

Talegaon Dabhade, Maval, Pune, 410507

Village: Talegaon Dabhade (R)
Taluka: Mawal
Pincode: 410507
Coordinates: 18.720312, 73.682903

Open in Maps Get directions Search Maps by name instead

The coordinates are the promoter's own, filed with MahaRERA. We have not checked them on the ground, and a filed pin is occasionally a few kilometres from the survey number on the same filing — if it does not look right, search by name.

Flat sizes on file

All 41 flats are filed unit by unit with the authority, the highest on floor 7. Sizes are RERA carpet area — the floor you can actually walk on, not a built-up or saleable figure. The register holds them in square metres, so that figure is printed under each one: it is what you will see if you open the filing, and the square feet are our arithmetic on it.

2 BHK 12 units · 6 available

6 units 603 sq ft 55.98 sq m as filed

6 units 604 sq ft 56.11 sq m as filed

3 BHK 29 units · 25 available

7 units 785 sq ft 72.92 sq m as filed

7 units 792 sq ft 73.56 sq m as filed

1 unit 801 sq ft 74.37 sq m as filed

7 units 819 sq ft 76.13 sq m as filed

7 units 842 sq ft 78.18 sq m as filed

Units sold

10 / 41

Early sales

24% absorption rate

Visual area guide See what the filed sizes feel like 2 generic footprints scaled from the registered carpet areas.

What each size looks like

Generic layouts, not this project's plans. Only the carpet area is from the register — the rooms are the usual shares of a flat that size, and where the promoter actually put the kitchen or which way the balcony faces is not filed anywhere. Read them for scale, which is the part that is arithmetic on the register: each room is drawn to its share of the area filed for that flat, and each flat to its size against the largest one drawn below.

2 BHK 12 flats · 6 available

603 sq ft carpet as drawn, from 603–604 sq ft filed in this configuration

Carpet, filed: 603 sq ft
Built-up: about 724 sq ft
Super built-up: about 844 sq ft

Every room in this flat

Living and dining about 176 sq ft, Master bedroom about 117 sq ft, Second bedroom about 94 sq ft, Kitchen about 70 sq ft, Bath about 41 sq ft, Balcony about 41 sq ft, Second bath about 35 sq ft, Passage about 29 sq ft.

3 BHK 29 flats · 25 available

785 sq ft carpet as drawn, from 785–842 sq ft filed in this configuration

Carpet, filed: 785 sq ft
Built-up: about 942 sq ft
Super built-up: about 1,099 sq ft

Every room in this flat

Living and dining about 193 sq ft, Master bedroom about 129 sq ft, Second bedroom about 103 sq ft, Third bedroom about 84 sq ft, Kitchen about 77 sq ft, Bath about 45 sq ft, Balcony about 45 sq ft, Second bath about 39 sq ft, Passage about 39 sq ft, Third bath about 32 sq ft.

The built-up and super built-up figures are ours, not the promoter's: carpet plus 20% and plus 40%, which is the usual Pune loading. A promoter can load more, and the number they quote is the one to check against the agreement. Which of the three you are actually buying, and why the register only records one of them, is in our guide to carpet against super built-up area.

What buyers actually paid

₹5,391 per sq ft of carpet, median of 10 registered sales

Range across those sales	₹4,635 to ₹5,894 per sq ft
Sold and booked	10 sold, 0 booked
Still available	31 flats, 603–842 sq ft

A registered price is what a buyer contracted to pay, so it is the closest thing to a real number this market produces. It still is not a quote for you: these agreements were signed on different dates as the project progressed, floor and facing move the rate, and what a builder asks today may be higher or lower. Unsold flats carry a government ready-reckoner valuation instead of a price, and that is a different thing, so it is not mixed into the figures above.

Timeline audit

Original proposed Aug 2026

Current status Was due Aug 2026

Stable projection

No delay reported in the latest RERA filings. Construction is recorded against the original baseline date the promoter registered.

Deep due diligence Open the complete registry dossier Land, promoter, complaints, title papers, plans and the raw MahaRERA record.

The land itself

Plot No 155 and 156 CTS No 108 and 117 is the plot this project is built on, as filed

Revenue village	Talegaon Dabhade (R) · shown on this site as Talegaon Dabhade
Taluka	Mawal
Street, as filed	Talegaon Dabhade
Bounded north by	Colony Road
Bounded east by	Plot No 154 and Plot No 157
Bounded south by	Colony Road
Bounded west by	Colony Road

Every promoter has to file the survey numbers of the land and what lies on each of its four sides. It is the driest thing on this page and the most useful if you are serious: the survey number is what the revenue record is keyed on, so it is what you quote to check the seven-twelve extract, and the boundaries are how you confirm on site that the plot you were shown is the plot that was registered.

"Street" is the register's own field name and promoters fill it with whatever they have — a road, a locality, sometimes the survey numbers again. It is printed as filed rather than tidied up.

Who is behind this project

Filed by the promoter with MahaRERA.

Promoter on the register	Prammukh Associates
Registered office	703, Aditya Society, Maa Kalinagar, Mulund East, Mumbai City 400081

Professionals named on the filing

Architect	Ajay Bawale CA/94/17000
Engineer	Prabhulal Chothani 840004467
Chartered Accountant	Nilesh Raut 137790
Chartered Accountant	priyesh jain 194983

The promoter appoints these, and MahaRERA requires the architect and engineer to certify progress before money can be drawn from the project account. A name that recurs across several of a builder's projects is normal; one that recurs across several lapsed ones is worth a question.

Title and ownership papers

29 November 2024 is when an advocate last certified the title to this land

Title report Legal Title 27112024.pdf	29 November 2024
Promoter's declaration, Form B Form-B Affidavit 21102024_compressed.pdf	8 November 2024

No project reaches the register without an advocate's report on the title to its land, so a title report on file is the floor and not a distinction. What the date tells you is how recently somebody qualified looked. What none of it tells you is whether the title is clear: a report can record an objection, a pending suit or a missing consent and still be a perfectly valid filing, and nothing here reads the contents of the document.

So read it yourself before you pay a booking amount, and read the newest one. Every document above is on the authority's page for this project, under the filename shown — the link is in Check this yourself. What to look for in each one, and what having it on file does not prove, is set out in our guide to a project's title papers.

RERA filing records

View all

Every figure here is the authority's, not ours, as of the date at the top of this page. This is the raw record, reproduced without alteration.

Field	As filed with MahaRERA
Registration number	P52100078634
Promoter	Prammukh Associates
Project type	Residential / Group Housing · Building development
Locality	Talegaon Dabhade — Mawal taluka, pincode 410507
Applied on	11 November 2024
Registered on	30 December 2024
Completion, as first filed	31 August 2026
Was due	31 August 2026
Units declared	41
Units sold	10 of 41 sold (24%), 31 still unsold
Complaints	0 on record with MahaRERA
Certificate on file	Original registration certificate, issued 30 December 2024
Application reference	REA52100165566
Current status	Lapsed
Record last changed	30 December 2024 · 21 months ago

Where the sold count comes from, and whether it holds up. 10 of 41 is the promoter's own figure, from the quarterly progress report every registered project has to file. Nobody audits that. But they file a second, separate thing with the same authority: the building unit by unit. That list accounts for all 41 flats and reaches the same answer — 10 sold, every one with money recorded as received against a named flat, and 31 still unsold. Two filings, made separately, agreeing to the unit. That is not an audit, but it is a good deal harder to fudge than one round number. Either way, this is only as current as the last change to the record, 30 December 2024.

Common questions

Is Luxuria registered with MahaRERA?: It was, as P52100078634, filed on 30 December 2024. That registration has since lapsed. A promoter may not advertise, market or sell in a project whose registration is not current, and a lapse does not by itself say the building has stopped.
When was Luxuria due to be handed over?: August 2026, and that date has passed without a handover being filed — 24 days ago. Section 18 of the Act gives an allottee a remedy when a promoter misses the date in the agreement.
What did buyers actually pay in Luxuria?: A median of ₹5,391 per square foot of carpet, across 10 sale agreements registered in this project. That is what was paid and stamped, not what is being asked.
How many flats are left in Luxuria?: 31 of 41 were still unsold at the promoter's last filing, in 2, 3 BHK, from 603–842 sq ft of carpet.
Are there complaints against Luxuria?: None appear against this project in the register. That covers cases filed with MahaRERA, and nothing about disputes settled elsewhere or never filed.
Who is building Luxuria?: Prammukh Associates, as the promoter named on the registration.

Check this yourself

This page restates one public record as we read it on 24 September 2026. The authority's own page for P52100078634 carries more that we do not republish: the registration certificate, every quarterly progress report, the sanctioned plans, parking allocation, the project bank account, and any declared litigation.

Open on MahaRERA Or search the register

MahaRERA will ask you to type a CAPTCHA first. That is their gate, not a broken link — and it is the reason this page exists, because a register you have to solve a puzzle to read one project at a time is not one anybody comparing four projects will actually use.