RERA registered P52100053892 Active
Shri Keshavlaxmi
Kothrud, Pune · Residential / Group Housing by Amol Ajit Ravetkar
Official record Updated from the register 21 September 2026. Anything filed since then is not here yet.
In short
Shri Keshavlaxmi in Kothrud is MahaRERA-registered (P52100053892) and still under construction, with possession filed for July 2028. Buyers have already registered 6 sales here at a median ₹4,138 per sq ft of carpet — not an asking price. About 42% of the 52 units are sold. 3 complaints sit on the filing. Amol Ajit Ravetkar is the promoter.
- Sold here at
- ₹4,138
- per sq ft, 6 registered sales
- Available
- 3 BHK
- 30 left · 384–1,317 sq ft
- Now due
- Jul 2028
- 4 months later than first promised
Where this is
Kothrud, PMC, Pune, 411038
The coordinates are the promoter's own, filed with MahaRERA. We have not checked them on the ground, and a filed pin is occasionally a few kilometres from the survey number on the same filing — if it does not look right, search by name.
Flat sizes on file
All 52 flats are filed unit by unit with the authority, the highest on floor 13. Sizes are RERA carpet area — the floor you can actually walk on, not a built-up or saleable figure. The register holds them in square metres, so that figure is printed under each one: it is what you will see if you open the filing, and the square feet are our arithmetic on it.
3 BHK 52 units · 30 available
16 further sizes, 16 units between them
22 / 52
42% absorption rate
Visual area guide See what the filed sizes feel like 1 generic footprint scaled from the registered carpet areas.
What each size looks like
Generic layouts, not this project's plans. Only the carpet area is from the register — the rooms are the usual shares of a flat that size, and where the promoter actually put the kitchen or which way the balcony faces is not filed anywhere. Read them for scale, which is the part that is arithmetic on the register: each room is drawn to its share of the area filed for that flat, and each flat to its size against the largest one drawn below.
3 BHK 52 flats · 30 available
623 sq ft carpet as drawn, from 384–1,521 sq ft filed in this configuration
- Carpet, filed
- 623 sq ft
- Built-up
- about 748 sq ft
- Super built-up
- about 872 sq ft
Every room in this flat
Living and dining about 153 sq ft, Master bedroom about 102 sq ft, Second bedroom about 82 sq ft, Third bedroom about 66 sq ft, Kitchen about 61 sq ft, Bath about 36 sq ft, Balcony about 36 sq ft, Second bath about 31 sq ft, Passage about 31 sq ft, Third bath about 26 sq ft.
The built-up and super built-up figures are ours, not the promoter's: carpet plus 20% and plus 40%, which is the usual Pune loading. A promoter can load more, and the number they quote is the one to check against the agreement. Which of the three you are actually buying, and why the register only records one of them, is in our guide to carpet against super built-up area.
What buyers actually paid
| Range across those sales | ₹3,419 to ₹6,190 per sq ft |
|---|---|
| Sold and booked | 22 sold, 0 booked |
| Still available | 30 flats, 384–1521 sq ft |
A registered price is what a buyer contracted to pay, so it is the closest thing to a real number this market produces. It still is not a quote for you: these agreements were signed on different dates as the project progressed, floor and facing move the rate, and what a builder asks today may be higher or lower. Unsold flats carry a government ready-reckoner valuation instead of a price, and that is a different thing, so it is not mixed into the figures above.
16 further sales are set aside. They divide out beyond ₹13,652 per sq ft, more than two and a half times this project's own median. A flat does not cost that much more than its neighbours on the same price list, so the usual cause is a carpet area filed too small for the agreement value printed beside it. Both figures are on the register exactly as shown — you can check them in the register itself — but no rate is computed from them here. Counted rather than quietly dropped.
Timeline audit
Revised projection
The completion date has moved from March 2028 to July 2028, 4 months later, on the promoter's own revised filing.
Under section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, a buyer whose possession is delayed beyond the date in the agreement may withdraw and claim a refund with interest, or stay and claim interest for every month of delay. That right attaches to the date in your agreement, not the date on this page.
Deep due diligence Open the complete registry dossier Land, promoter, complaints, title papers, plans and the raw MahaRERA record.
The land itself
| Revenue village | Kothrud |
|---|---|
| Taluka | Haveli |
| Street, as filed | Paud Road |
| Bounded north by | By 9mtr Colony Road |
| Bounded east by | By 12 mtr Colony Road |
| Bounded south by | By Plot No 24 |
| Bounded west by | By Plot No 20 |
Every promoter has to file the survey numbers of the land and what lies on each of its four sides. It is the driest thing on this page and the most useful if you are serious: the survey number is what the revenue record is keyed on, so it is what you quote to check the seven-twelve extract, and the boundaries are how you confirm on site that the plot you were shown is the plot that was registered.
"Street" is the register's own field name and promoters fill it with whatever they have — a road, a locality, sometimes the survey numbers again. It is printed as filed rather than tidied up.
Who is behind this project
Filed by the promoter with MahaRERA.
| Promoter on the register | Amol Ajit Ravetkar |
|---|---|
| Registered office | Plot No. 100 B 1/1, 1, Suneet, Near National Film Archive Of India, National Film Archive Of India, Prabhat Road, Pune 411004 |
Professionals named on the filing
| Architect | Akshay Digambar Khirodkar 2049 |
|---|---|
| Architect | Kaumudi Mathane CA/2023/155427 |
| Engineer | Nilesh Gujar NA |
| Engineer | Nilesh Gujar |
| Chartered Accountant | Phule Wagh & Associates LLP 180704 |
| Chartered Accountant | Phule Wagh & Associates LLP 180704 |
| Chartered Accountant | Prasad Sadvilkar 602866 |
The promoter appoints these, and MahaRERA requires the architect and engineer to certify progress before money can be drawn from the project account. A name that recurs across several of a builder's projects is normal; one that recurs across several lapsed ones is worth a question.
Complaints filed with MahaRERA
3 cases against this project, 3 with an order on record, filed between Nov 2025 and Apr 2026. Complainants' names are published by the authority; we leave them out. Quote the case number to look one up.
| Case number | Filed | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| SM12600259 | Apr 2026 | Order passed Apr 2026 |
| SM12600265 | Apr 2026 | Order passed Apr 2026 |
| SM12500177 | Nov 2025 | Order passed Nov 2025 |
A complaint is not proof of wrongdoing, and a project with none is not necessarily well run — most buyers never file. What the pattern shows is whether disputes here reached the regulator and whether they were decided.
Title and ownership papers
| Title report Format A.pdf | 7 November 2023 1 older version on file |
|---|---|
| Promoter's declaration, Form B Form B Affidavit - Ravetkar_v1_compressed.pdf | 8 November 2023 |
No project reaches the register without an advocate's report on the title to its land, so a title report on file is the floor and not a distinction. What the date tells you is how recently somebody qualified looked. What none of it tells you is whether the title is clear: a report can record an objection, a pending suit or a missing consent and still be a perfectly valid filing, and nothing here reads the contents of the document.
So read it yourself before you pay a booking amount, and read the newest one. Every document above is on the authority's page for this project, under the filename shown — the link is in Check this yourself. What to look for in each one, and what having it on file does not prove, is set out in our guide to a project's title papers.
RERA filing records
View allEvery figure here is the authority's, not ours, as of the date at the top of this page. This is the raw record, reproduced without alteration.
| Field | As filed with MahaRERA |
|---|---|
| Registration number | P52100053892 |
| Promoter | Amol Ajit Ravetkar |
| Project type | Residential / Group Housing · Building development |
| Locality | Kothrud — Haveli taluka, pincode 411038 |
| Applied on | 09 November 2023 |
| Registered on | 08 December 2023 |
| Completion, as first filed | 31 March 2028 |
| Due | 31 July 2028 4 months later |
| Units declared | 52 |
| Units sold | 22 of 52 sold (42%), 30 still unsold |
| Complaints | 3 on record with MahaRERA |
| Certificate on file | Original registration certificate, issued 08 December 2023 |
| Application reference | REA52100149301 |
| Current status | Active |
| Record last changed | 08 December 2023 · over 2 years ago 2 years untouched |
Where the sold count comes from, and whether it holds up. 22 of 52 is the promoter's own figure, from the quarterly progress report every registered project has to file. Nobody audits that. But they file a second, separate thing with the same authority: the building unit by unit. That list accounts for all 52 flats and reaches the same answer — 22 sold, every one with money recorded as received against a named flat, and 30 still unsold. Two filings, made separately, agreeing to the unit. That is not an audit, but it is a good deal harder to fudge than one round number. Either way, this is only as current as the last change to the record, 08 December 2023.
MahaRERA has not recorded a change to this project's record in 2 years, while still listing it as under construction. That date moves on status changes and system updates as well as on anything the promoter files, so it is not proof the site is idle — but on a project still being sold, it is worth asking the promoter what has been filed since.
Common questions
- Is Shri Keshavlaxmi registered with MahaRERA?
- Yes. It is registered as P52100053892, filed on 08 December 2023, and the registration is current. The authority's own record is the place to confirm that; this page restates it.
- When is Shri Keshavlaxmi due to be handed over?
- The promoter has told MahaRERA July 2028. That is a declaration to the authority rather than a promise to a buyer; the date in your own agreement is the one that binds.
- Has Shri Keshavlaxmi been delayed?
- Yes. The first date filed was March 2028. It now stands at July 2028, 4 months later.
- What did buyers actually pay in Shri Keshavlaxmi?
- A median of ₹4,138 per square foot of carpet, across 6 sale agreements registered in this project. That is what was paid and stamped, not what is being asked.
- How many flats are left in Shri Keshavlaxmi?
- 30 of 52 were still unsold at the promoter's last filing, in 3 BHK, from 384–1,317 sq ft of carpet.
- Are there complaints against Shri Keshavlaxmi?
- 3 cases have been filed with MahaRERA against this project. A complaint is an allegation that has been lodged, not a finding against the promoter.
- Who is building Shri Keshavlaxmi?
- Amol Ajit Ravetkar, as the promoter named on the registration.
Check this yourself
This page restates one public record as we read it on 21 September 2026. The authority's own page for P52100053892 carries more that we do not republish: the registration certificate, every quarterly progress report, the sanctioned plans, parking allocation, the project bank account, and any declared litigation.
MahaRERA will ask you to type a CAPTCHA first. That is their gate, not a broken link — and it is the reason this page exists, because a register you have to solve a puzzle to read one project at a time is not one anybody comparing four projects will actually use.
Other projects in Kothrud
Stock image
1 complaint
- Due
- Apr 2028
- Units
- —
- Carpet
- —
- Typical unit
- —
Stock image
- Registered here
- ₹18,543
- On offer
- 2, 3 BHK + shops
- Due
- Apr 2028
- Units
- 20
- Carpet
- 701–1,443
- Sold at
- ₹1 crore
Stock image
- Valued from
- ₹16,248
- On offer
- Offices +2 more
3 complaints
- Due
- Jan 2028
- Units
- 82
- Carpet
- 666–8,085
- Typical unit
- ~₹1.4 crore