Is Guruprasad registered with MahaRERA?

Yes. It is registered as P52100009382, filed on 22 August 2017, and the registration is current. The authority's own record is the place to confirm that; this page restates it.

Has Guruprasad been handed over?

Yes. The completion date on the register is June 2025.

Has Guruprasad been delayed?

Yes. The first date filed was June 2019. It now stands at June 2025, 6 years later.

What did buyers actually pay in Guruprasad?

A median of ₹6,571 per square foot of carpet, across 43 sale agreements registered in this project. That is what was paid and stamped, not what is being asked.

How many flats are left in Guruprasad?

11 of 70 were still unsold at the promoter's last filing, in 1, 2 BHK, from 435–658 sq ft of carpet.

Are there complaints against Guruprasad?

None appear against this project in the register. That covers cases filed with MahaRERA, and nothing about disputes settled elsewhere or never filed.

Who is building Guruprasad?

Ashok Ramesh Pashankar, as the promoter named on the registration.

RERA registered P52100009382 Completed

Guruprasad

Hinjewadi, Pune · Residential / Group Housing by Ashok Ramesh Pashankar

Official record Updated from the register 04 October 2026. Anything filed since then is not here yet.

In short

Guruprasad in Hinjewadi is MahaRERA-registered (P52100009382) and was handed over in June 2025. Buyers have already registered 43 sales here at a median ₹6,571 per sq ft of carpet — not an asking price. About 61% of the 70 units are sold. Ashok Ramesh Pashankar is the promoter.

Stock image, not a photograph of Guruprasad — A stock photograph, not Guruprasad. We have no picture of this site yet.

Where this is

Hinjewadi, PMRDA, Pune, 411021

Village: Hinjavadi (CT)
Taluka: Mulshi
Pincode: 411021

Open in Maps Get directions

The promoter filed a coordinate that falls outside Pune district, so it is not used here. The link above searches Maps by name and locality instead.

Flat sizes on file

All 70 flats are filed unit by unit with the authority, the highest on floor 7. Sizes are RERA carpet area — the floor you can actually walk on, not a built-up or saleable figure. The register holds them in square metres, so that figure is printed under each one: it is what you will see if you open the filing, and the square feet are our arithmetic on it.

1 BHK 42 units · 5 available

4 units 435 sq ft 40.44 sq m as filed

4 units 436 sq ft 40.49 sq m as filed

2 units 438 sq ft 40.71 sq m as filed

2 units 440 sq ft 40.89 sq m as filed

2 units 448 sq ft 41.64 sq m as filed

10 units 449 sq ft 41.72 sq m as filed

8 units 451 sq ft 41.86–41.91 sq m as filed

2 units 452 sq ft 42.01 sq m as filed

6 units 477 sq ft 44.35 sq m as filed

2 units 480 sq ft 44.61 sq m as filed

2 BHK 28 units · 6 available

2 units 624 sq ft 57.99 sq m as filed

1 unit 625 sq ft 58.09 sq m as filed

10 units 632 sq ft 58.71 sq m as filed

5 units 658 sq ft 61.1–61.15 sq m as filed

3 units 659 sq ft 61.24 sq m as filed

3 units 681 sq ft 63.29–63.31 sq m as filed

1 unit 683 sq ft 63.48 sq m as filed

3 units 685 sq ft 63.68 sq m as filed

Units sold

43 / 70

Selling steadily

61% absorption rate

Visual area guide See what the filed sizes feel like 2 generic footprints scaled from the registered carpet areas.

What each size looks like

Generic layouts, not this project's plans. Only the carpet area is from the register — the rooms are the usual shares of a flat that size, and where the promoter actually put the kitchen or which way the balcony faces is not filed anywhere. Read them for scale, which is the part that is arithmetic on the register: each room is drawn to its share of the area filed for that flat, and each flat to its size against the largest one drawn below.

1 BHK 42 flats · 5 available

449 sq ft carpet as drawn, from 435–480 sq ft filed in this configuration

Carpet, filed: 449 sq ft
Built-up: about 539 sq ft
Super built-up: about 629 sq ft

Every room in this flat

Living and dining about 168 sq ft, Master bedroom about 112 sq ft, Kitchen about 67 sq ft, Bath about 39 sq ft, Balcony about 39 sq ft, Passage about 22 sq ft.

2 BHK 28 flats · 6 available

632 sq ft carpet as drawn, from 624–685 sq ft filed in this configuration

Carpet, filed: 632 sq ft
Built-up: about 758 sq ft
Super built-up: about 885 sq ft

Every room in this flat

Living and dining about 184 sq ft, Master bedroom about 123 sq ft, Second bedroom about 98 sq ft, Kitchen about 74 sq ft, Bath about 43 sq ft, Balcony about 43 sq ft, Second bath about 37 sq ft, Passage about 31 sq ft.

The built-up and super built-up figures are ours, not the promoter's: carpet plus 20% and plus 40%, which is the usual Pune loading. A promoter can load more, and the number they quote is the one to check against the agreement. Which of the three you are actually buying, and why the register only records one of them, is in our guide to carpet against super built-up area.

What buyers actually paid

₹6,571 per sq ft of carpet, median of 43 registered sales

Range across those sales	₹3,793 to ₹7,868 per sq ft
Sold and booked	43 sold, 0 booked
Still available	11 flats, 435–685 sq ft

A registered price is what a buyer contracted to pay, so it is the closest thing to a real number this market produces. It still is not a quote for you: these agreements were signed on different dates as the project progressed, floor and facing move the rate, and what a builder asks today may be higher or lower. Unsold flats carry a government ready-reckoner valuation instead of a price, and that is a different thing, so it is not mixed into the figures above.

Timeline audit

Original proposed Jun 2019

Current status Handed over Jun 2025

Revised projection

The completion date has moved from June 2019 to June 2025, 6 years later, on the promoter's own revised filing.

Buyers who took possession late here may still have had a claim under section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, which entitles them to interest for every month of delay beyond the date in their agreement. More usefully for anyone buying today, this is a record of how this promoter performed against their own filed date.

Deep due diligence Open the complete registry dossier Land, promoter, complaints, title papers, plans and the raw MahaRERA record.

The land itself

CTS No 15 and 17 is the plot this project is built on, as filed

Revenue village	Hinjavadi (CT) · shown on this site as Hinjewadi
Taluka	Mulshi
Street, as filed	HINJEWADI
Bounded north by	CTS No 15
Bounded east by	CTS No 18
Bounded south by	Road
Bounded west by	CTS No 16

Every promoter has to file the survey numbers of the land and what lies on each of its four sides. It is the driest thing on this page and the most useful if you are serious: the survey number is what the revenue record is keyed on, so it is what you quote to check the seven-twelve extract, and the boundaries are how you confirm on site that the plot you were shown is the plot that was registered.

"Street" is the register's own field name and promoters fill it with whatever they have — a road, a locality, sometimes the survey numbers again. It is printed as filed rather than tidied up.

Who is behind this project

Filed by the promoter with MahaRERA.

Promoter on the register	Ashok Ramesh Pashankar
Registered office	Flat No 1, 1, Shreeganesh Apartment, Shivalay Society, Pashan, Sus Road, Pune 411021

Professionals named on the filing

Architect	Aniruddhe T Shinde
Engineer	Pratikk Gujar
Chartered Accountant	Mahavir Kothari & Associates 114269

The promoter appoints these, and MahaRERA requires the architect and engineer to certify progress before money can be drawn from the project account. A name that recurs across several of a builder's projects is normal; one that recurs across several lapsed ones is worth a question.

Title and ownership papers

30 July 2017 is when an advocate last certified the title to this land

Title report title search report .pdf	30 July 2017
Promoter's declaration, Form B FORM B DECLARATION (1).pdf	27 March 2024 1 older version on file

No project reaches the register without an advocate's report on the title to its land, so a title report on file is the floor and not a distinction. What the date tells you is how recently somebody qualified looked. What none of it tells you is whether the title is clear: a report can record an objection, a pending suit or a missing consent and still be a perfectly valid filing, and nothing here reads the contents of the document.

So read it yourself before you pay a booking amount, and read the newest one. Every document above is on the authority's page for this project, under the filename shown — the link is in Check this yourself. What to look for in each one, and what having it on file does not prove, is set out in our guide to a project's title papers.

RERA filing records

View all

Every figure here is the authority's, not ours, as of the date at the top of this page. This is the raw record, reproduced without alteration.

Field	As filed with MahaRERA
Registration number	P52100009382
Promoter	Ashok Ramesh Pashankar
Project type	Residential / Group Housing · Building development
Locality	Hinjewadi — Mulshi taluka, pincode 411021
Applied on	31 July 2017
Registered on	22 August 2017
Completion, as first filed	30 June 2019
Handed over	30 June 2025 6 years later
Units declared	70
Units sold	43 of 70 sold (61%), 27 still unsold
Complaints	0 on record with MahaRERA
Certificate on file	Original registration certificate, issued 10 July 2024
Application reference	REA52100015229
Current status	Completed
Record last changed	11 July 2024 · over 2 years ago

Where the sold count comes from, and whether it holds up. 43 of 70 is the promoter's own figure, from the quarterly progress report every registered project has to file. Nobody audits that. But they file a second, separate thing with the same authority: the building unit by unit. That list accounts for all 70 flats and reaches the same answer — 43 sold, every one with money recorded as received against a named flat, and 11 still unsold. Two filings, made separately, agreeing to the unit. That is not an audit, but it is a good deal harder to fudge than one round number. Either way, this is only as current as the last change to the record, 11 July 2024.

Common questions

Is Guruprasad registered with MahaRERA?: Yes. It is registered as P52100009382, filed on 22 August 2017, and the registration is current. The authority's own record is the place to confirm that; this page restates it.
Has Guruprasad been handed over?: Yes. The completion date on the register is June 2025.
Has Guruprasad been delayed?: Yes. The first date filed was June 2019. It now stands at June 2025, 6 years later.
What did buyers actually pay in Guruprasad?: A median of ₹6,571 per square foot of carpet, across 43 sale agreements registered in this project. That is what was paid and stamped, not what is being asked.
How many flats are left in Guruprasad?: 11 of 70 were still unsold at the promoter's last filing, in 1, 2 BHK, from 435–658 sq ft of carpet.
Are there complaints against Guruprasad?: None appear against this project in the register. That covers cases filed with MahaRERA, and nothing about disputes settled elsewhere or never filed.
Who is building Guruprasad?: Ashok Ramesh Pashankar, as the promoter named on the registration.

Check this yourself

This page restates one public record as we read it on 04 October 2026. The authority's own page for P52100009382 carries more that we do not republish: the registration certificate, every quarterly progress report, the sanctioned plans, parking allocation, the project bank account, and any declared litigation.

Open on MahaRERA Or search the register

MahaRERA will ask you to type a CAPTCHA first. That is their gate, not a broken link — and it is the reason this page exists, because a register you have to solve a puzzle to read one project at a time is not one anybody comparing four projects will actually use.