Is Panchratna registered with MahaRERA?

Yes. It is registered as PR1260002500550, filed on 11 August 2025, and the registration is current. The authority's own record is the place to confirm that; this page restates it.

When is Panchratna due to be handed over?

The promoter has told MahaRERA October 2027. That is a declaration to the authority rather than a promise to a buyer; the date in your own agreement is the one that binds.

Has Panchratna been delayed?

Yes. The first date filed was June 2027. It now stands at October 2027, 4 months later.

What did buyers actually pay in Panchratna?

A median of ₹23,013 per square foot of carpet, across 3 sale agreements registered in this project. That is what was paid and stamped, not what is being asked.

How many flats are left in Panchratna?

5 of 8 were still unsold at the promoter's last filing, in 1 BHK, from 624 sq ft of carpet.

Are there complaints against Panchratna?

None appear against this project in the register. That covers cases filed with MahaRERA, and nothing about disputes settled elsewhere or never filed.

Who is building Panchratna?

Chaphalkar Karandikar Developers, as the promoter named on the registration.

RERA registered PR1260002500550 Active

Panchratna

Gokhalenagar, Pune · Residential / Group Housing by Chaphalkar Karandikar Developers

Official record Updated from the register 21 September 2026. Anything filed since then is not here yet.

In short

Panchratna in Gokhalenagar is MahaRERA-registered (PR1260002500550) and still under construction, with possession filed for October 2027. Buyers have already registered 3 sales here at a median ₹23,013 per sq ft of carpet — not an asking price. About 38% of the 8 units are sold. Chaphalkar Karandikar Developers is the promoter.

Stock image, not a photograph of Panchratna — A stock photograph, not Panchratna. We have no picture of this site yet.

Where this is

Gokhalenagar, Pune, 411016

Street map of Gokhalenagar centred on the coordinate filed for Panchratna, about 1.4 km across. — Streets within about 700 m of the pin the promoter filed. Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.

Village: Pune (M Corp.)
Taluka: Pune City
Pincode: 411016
Coordinates: 18.532485, 73.837495

Open in Maps Get directions Search Maps by name instead

The coordinates are the promoter's own, filed with MahaRERA. We have not checked them on the ground, and a filed pin is occasionally a few kilometres from the survey number on the same filing — if it does not look right, search by name.

Flat sizes on file

All 8 flats are filed unit by unit with the authority, the highest on floor 7. Sizes are RERA carpet area — the floor you can actually walk on, not a built-up or saleable figure. The register holds them in square metres, so that figure is printed under each one: it is what you will see if you open the filing, and the square feet are our arithmetic on it.

1 BHK 6 units · 5 available

6 units 624 sq ft 58.0 sq m as filed

3 BHK 2 units · all sold

1 unit 1077 sq ft 100.09 sq m as filed

1 unit 1158 sq ft 107.56 sq m as filed

Units sold

3 / 8

Early sales

38% absorption rate

Visual area guide See what the filed sizes feel like 2 generic footprints scaled from the registered carpet areas.

What each size looks like

Generic layouts, not this project's plans. Only the carpet area is from the register — the rooms are the usual shares of a flat that size, and where the promoter actually put the kitchen or which way the balcony faces is not filed anywhere. Read them for scale, which is the part that is arithmetic on the register: each room is drawn to its share of the area filed for that flat, and each flat to its size against the largest one drawn below.

1 BHK 6 flats · 5 available

624 sq ft carpet as drawn

Carpet, filed: 624 sq ft
Built-up: about 749 sq ft
Super built-up: about 874 sq ft

Every room in this flat

Living and dining about 234 sq ft, Master bedroom about 156 sq ft, Kitchen about 94 sq ft, Bath about 55 sq ft, Balcony about 55 sq ft, Passage about 31 sq ft.

3 BHK 2 flats · none available

1,077 sq ft carpet as drawn, from 1,077–1,158 sq ft filed in this configuration

Carpet, filed: 1,077 sq ft
Built-up: about 1,292 sq ft
Super built-up: about 1,508 sq ft

Every room in this flat

Living and dining about 265 sq ft, Master bedroom about 177 sq ft, Second bedroom about 141 sq ft, Third bedroom about 115 sq ft, Kitchen about 106 sq ft, Bath about 62 sq ft, Balcony about 62 sq ft, Second bath about 53 sq ft, Passage about 53 sq ft, Third bath about 44 sq ft.

The built-up and super built-up figures are ours, not the promoter's: carpet plus 20% and plus 40%, which is the usual Pune loading. A promoter can load more, and the number they quote is the one to check against the agreement. Which of the three you are actually buying, and why the register only records one of them, is in our guide to carpet against super built-up area.

What buyers actually paid

₹23,013 per sq ft of carpet, median of 3 registered sales

Range across those sales	₹19,916 to ₹35,634 per sq ft
Sold and booked	1 sold, 2 booked
Still available	5 flats, 624–1158 sq ft

A registered price is what a buyer contracted to pay, so it is the closest thing to a real number this market produces. It still is not a quote for you: these agreements were signed on different dates as the project progressed, floor and facing move the rate, and what a builder asks today may be higher or lower. Unsold flats carry a government ready-reckoner valuation instead of a price, and that is a different thing, so it is not mixed into the figures above.

Timeline audit

Original proposed Jun 2027

Current status Due Oct 2027

Revised projection

The completion date has moved from June 2027 to October 2027, 4 months later, on the promoter's own revised filing.

Under section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, a buyer whose possession is delayed beyond the date in the agreement may withdraw and claim a refund with interest, or stay and claim interest for every month of delay. That right attaches to the date in your agreement, not the date on this page.

Deep due diligence Open the complete registry dossier Land, promoter, complaints, title papers, plans and the raw MahaRERA record.

The land itself

C.T.S. No. 1098/4/A, Final Plot No. – 880/4B, Shivaji Nagar – Bhamburda is the plot this project is built on, as filed

Revenue village	Pune (M Corp.) · shown on this site as Gokhalenagar
Taluka	Pune City
Street, as filed	Model colony
Bounded north by	18 Meter Road
Bounded east by	Open Road
Bounded south by	Plot No. 8
Bounded west by	Plot No. 5B

Every promoter has to file the survey numbers of the land and what lies on each of its four sides. It is the driest thing on this page and the most useful if you are serious: the survey number is what the revenue record is keyed on, so it is what you quote to check the seven-twelve extract, and the boundaries are how you confirm on site that the plot you were shown is the plot that was registered.

"Street" is the register's own field name and promoters fill it with whatever they have — a road, a locality, sometimes the survey numbers again. It is printed as filed rather than tidied up.

Who is behind this project

Filed by the promoter with MahaRERA.

Promoter on the register	Chaphalkar Karandikar Developers
Registered office	111, Mangala Multiplex, Shivaji Nagar, Near Pmc Building, Pune 411005

Professionals named on the filing

Architect	G N A Architects CA/2011/51343
Engineer	Abhijeet Madhukar Khade
Engineer	G A Bhilare Consultants Private Limited
Chartered Accountant	J P N R & Associates 193944

The promoter appoints these, and MahaRERA requires the architect and engineer to certify progress before money can be drawn from the project account. A name that recurs across several of a builder's projects is normal; one that recurs across several lapsed ones is worth a question.

Title and ownership papers

26 June 2025 is when an advocate last certified the title to this land

Title report Title.pdf	26 June 2025
Promoter's declaration, Form B Form B - Promoter.pdf	25 June 2025
Annexure A declaration Annexure A Order 50.pdf	18 July 2025

No project reaches the register without an advocate's report on the title to its land, so a title report on file is the floor and not a distinction. What the date tells you is how recently somebody qualified looked. What none of it tells you is whether the title is clear: a report can record an objection, a pending suit or a missing consent and still be a perfectly valid filing, and nothing here reads the contents of the document.

So read it yourself before you pay a booking amount, and read the newest one. Every document above is on the authority's page for this project, under the filename shown — the link is in Check this yourself. What to look for in each one, and what having it on file does not prove, is set out in our guide to a project's title papers.

RERA filing records

View all

Every figure here is the authority's, not ours, as of the date at the top of this page. This is the raw record, reproduced without alteration.

Field	As filed with MahaRERA
Registration number	PR1260002500550
Promoter	Chaphalkar Karandikar Developers
Project type	Residential / Group Housing · Building development
Locality	Gokhalenagar — Pune City taluka, pincode 411016
Applied on	18 July 2025
Registered on	11 August 2025
Completion, as first filed	30 June 2027
Due	30 October 2027 4 months later
Units declared	8
Units sold	3 of 8 sold (38%), 5 still unsold
Complaints	0 on record with MahaRERA
Certificate on file	Original registration certificate, issued 11 August 2025
Application reference	ACK11062501166
Current status	Active
Record last changed	11 August 2025 · 13 months ago

Where the sold count comes from, and whether it holds up. 3 of 8 is the promoter's own figure, from the quarterly progress report every registered project has to file. Nobody audits that. But they file a second, separate thing with the same authority: the building unit by unit. That list accounts for all 8 flats and reaches the same answer — 1 sold, every one with money recorded as received against a named flat, 2 booked with a price agreed but nothing received yet, and 5 still unsold. Two filings, made separately, agreeing to the unit. That is not an audit, but it is a good deal harder to fudge than one round number. Either way, this is only as current as the last change to the record, 11 August 2025.

Common questions

Is Panchratna registered with MahaRERA?: Yes. It is registered as PR1260002500550, filed on 11 August 2025, and the registration is current. The authority's own record is the place to confirm that; this page restates it.
When is Panchratna due to be handed over?: The promoter has told MahaRERA October 2027. That is a declaration to the authority rather than a promise to a buyer; the date in your own agreement is the one that binds.
Has Panchratna been delayed?: Yes. The first date filed was June 2027. It now stands at October 2027, 4 months later.
What did buyers actually pay in Panchratna?: A median of ₹23,013 per square foot of carpet, across 3 sale agreements registered in this project. That is what was paid and stamped, not what is being asked.
How many flats are left in Panchratna?: 5 of 8 were still unsold at the promoter's last filing, in 1 BHK, from 624 sq ft of carpet.
Are there complaints against Panchratna?: None appear against this project in the register. That covers cases filed with MahaRERA, and nothing about disputes settled elsewhere or never filed.
Who is building Panchratna?: Chaphalkar Karandikar Developers, as the promoter named on the registration.

Check this yourself

This page restates one public record as we read it on 21 September 2026. The authority's own page for PR1260002500550 carries more that we do not republish: the registration certificate, every quarterly progress report, the sanctioned plans, parking allocation, the project bank account, and any declared litigation.

Open on MahaRERA Or search the register

MahaRERA will ask you to type a CAPTCHA first. That is their gate, not a broken link — and it is the reason this page exists, because a register you have to solve a puzzle to read one project at a time is not one anybody comparing four projects will actually use.