RERA registered P52100016102 Active
Raj Apoorvam
Chakan, Pune · Others by Crystal Landmark
Official record Updated from the register 23 October 2026. Anything filed since then is not here yet.
In short
Raj Apoorvam in Chakan is MahaRERA-registered (P52100016102) and still under construction, with possession filed for December 2027. Buyers have already registered 11 sales here at a median ₹4,240 per sq ft of carpet — not an asking price. About 11% of the 131 units are sold. 2 complaints sit on the filing. Crystal Landmark is the promoter.
- Sold here at
- ₹4,240
- per sq ft, 11 registered sales
- Available
- 1 BHK
- 81 left · 345–525 sq ft
- Now due
- Dec 2027
- 4 years later than first promised
Chakan, PMRDA, Pune, 410501
The coordinates are the promoter's own, filed with MahaRERA. We have not checked them on the ground, and a filed pin is occasionally a few kilometres from the survey number on the same filing — if it does not look right, search by name.
Unit sizes on file
All 131 units are filed unit by unit with the authority, the highest on floor 11. Sizes are RERA carpet area — the floor you can actually walk on, not a built-up or saleable figure. The register holds them in square metres, so that figure is printed under each one: it is what you will see if you open the filing, and the square feet are our arithmetic on it.
1 BHK Residences
Office Space Suite
Shops Suite
Carpet Area vs. Loading Factor Arithmetic
How statutory carpet translates to standard Pune market quoted areas (+20% Built-up, +40% Super Built-up)
| Unit Configuration | Statutory RERA Carpet (Actual) | Approx Built-up (+20%) | Super Built-up (+40% Loading) | Available Inventory |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 BHK | 345 – 525 sq ft (32.03 – 48.82 sq m) | ~414 – 630 sq ft | ~483 – 735 sq ft | 81 left of 119 |
| Office Space | 164 – 240 sq ft (15.2 – 22.31 sq m) | ~197 – 288 sq ft | ~230 – 336 sq ft | 0 left of 6 |
| Shops | 164 – 240 sq ft (15.2 – 22.31 sq m) | ~197 – 288 sq ft | ~230 – 336 sq ft | 0 left of 6 |
14 / 131
11% absorption rate
Visual area guide See what the filed sizes feel like 1 generic footprint scaled from the registered carpet areas.
What each size looks like
Generic layouts, not this project's plans. Only the carpet area is from the register — the rooms are the usual shares of a unit that size, and where the promoter actually put the kitchen or which way the balcony faces is not filed anywhere. Read them for scale, which is the part that is arithmetic on the register: each room is drawn to its share of the area filed for that unit, and each unit to its size against the largest one drawn below.
1 BHK 119 units · 81 available
346 sq ft carpet as drawn, from 345–525 sq ft filed in this configuration
- Carpet, filed
- 346 sq ft
- Built-up
- about 415 sq ft
- Super built-up
- about 484 sq ft
Every room in this unit
Living and dining about 130 sq ft, Master bedroom about 86 sq ft, Kitchen about 52 sq ft, Bath about 30 sq ft, Balcony about 30 sq ft, Passage about 17 sq ft.
The built-up and super built-up figures are ours, not the promoter's: carpet plus 20% and plus 40%, which is the usual Pune loading. A promoter can load more, and the number they quote is the one to check against the agreement. Which of the three you are actually buying, and why the register only records one of them, is in our guide to carpet against super built-up area.
What buyers actually paid
| Range across those sales | ₹3,328 to ₹6,638 per sq ft |
|---|---|
| Sold and booked | 14 sold, 0 booked |
| Still available | 81 units, 164–525 sq ft |
A registered price is what a buyer contracted to pay, so it is the closest thing to a real number this market produces. It still is not a quote for you: these agreements were signed on different dates as the project progressed, floor and facing move the rate, and what a builder asks today may be higher or lower. Unsold units carry a government ready-reckoner valuation instead of a price, and that is a different thing, so it is not mixed into the figures above.
Revised delivery projection
The completion date has moved from December 2023 to December 2027, 4 years later, on the promoter's own revised filing.
Under section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, a buyer whose possession is delayed beyond the date in the agreement may withdraw and claim a refund with interest, or stay and claim interest for every month of delay. That right attaches to the date in your agreement, not the date on this page.
Deep due diligence Open the complete registry dossier Land, promoter, complaints, title papers, plans and the raw MahaRERA record.
The land itself
| Revenue village | Chakan (CT) · shown on this site as Chakan |
|---|---|
| Taluka | Khed |
| Street, as filed | TALEGAON SHIKRAPUR |
| Bounded north by | ADJ G NO 1016 1020 1022 TO 1024 1030 1028 |
| Bounded east by | ADJ G 1050 1043 |
| Bounded south by | ADJ G NO 1034 1043 1060 |
| Bounded west by | 12 M- 15 MROAD ADJ G NO 1034 1043 1036 TO 1041 |
Every promoter has to file the survey numbers of the land and what lies on each of its four sides. It is the driest thing on this page and the most useful if you are serious: the survey number is what the revenue record is keyed on, so it is what you quote to check the seven-twelve extract, and the boundaries are how you confirm on site that the plot you were shown is the plot that was registered.
"Street" is the register's own field name and promoters fill it with whatever they have — a road, a locality, sometimes the survey numbers again. It is printed as filed rather than tidied up.
Who is behind this project
Filed by the promoter with MahaRERA.
| Promoter on the register | Crystal Landmark |
|---|---|
| Registered office | C 75, 75, Raj House, Sector 12, Navi Mumbai, Kharghar, Raigarh 410210 |
Professionals named on the filing
| Architect | Dinesh Khedkar STATE/R/2025/APL/15518 |
|---|---|
| Architect | Prime Architects CA/2015/69629 |
| Architect | Yogesh Wakchaure & Associates STATE/R/2025/APL/15518 |
| Engineer | Manav Varu REG/PMC/STE/2073/23 |
| Chartered Accountant | Jain Pratik and Co. 157919 |
| Chartered Accountant | KPGA and Associates 117825 |
| Chartered Accountant | Vijay Sawant and Co 166017 |
The promoter appoints these, and MahaRERA requires the architect and engineer to certify progress before money can be drawn from the project account. A name that recurs across several of a builder's projects is normal; one that recurs across several lapsed ones is worth a question.
Complaints filed with MahaRERA
2 cases against this project, 2 with an order on record, filed between Jul 2025 and Jan 2026. Complainants' names are published by the authority; we leave them out. Quote the case number to look one up.
| Case number | Filed | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| CC12600317 | Jan 2026 | Order passed Jan 2026 |
| CC12502584 | Jul 2025 | Order passed Jul 2025 |
A complaint is not proof of wrongdoing, and a project with none is not necessarily well run — most buyers never file. What the pattern shows is whether disputes here reached the regulator and whether they were decided.
Title and ownership papers
| Title report SERACH REPORT.pdf | 23 March 2018 |
|---|---|
| Promoter's declaration, Form B FORM B.pdf | 23 March 2018 |
No project reaches the register without an advocate's report on the title to its land, so a title report on file is the floor and not a distinction. What the date tells you is how recently somebody qualified looked. What none of it tells you is whether the title is clear: a report can record an objection, a pending suit or a missing consent and still be a perfectly valid filing, and nothing here reads the contents of the document.
So read it yourself before you pay a booking amount, and read the newest one. Every document above is on the authority's page for this project, under the filename shown — the link is in Check this yourself. What to look for in each one, and what having it on file does not prove, is set out in our guide to a project's title papers.
RERA filing records
View allEvery figure here is the authority's, not ours, as of the date at the top of this page. This is the raw record, reproduced without alteration.
| Field | As filed with MahaRERA |
|---|---|
| Registration number | P52100016102 |
| Promoter | Crystal Landmark |
| Project type | Others · Building development |
| Locality | Chakan — Khed taluka, pincode 410501 |
| Applied on | 13 April 2018 |
| Registered on | 17 April 2018 |
| Completion, as first filed | 30 December 2023 |
| Due | 31 December 2027 4 years later |
| Units declared | 131 |
| Units sold | 14 of 131 sold (11%), 117 still unsold |
| Complaints | 2 on record with MahaRERA |
| Certificate on file | Extension certificate, issued 27 April 2026 |
| Application reference | REA52100036069 |
| Current status | Active |
| Record last changed | 27 April 2026 · 6 months ago |
Where the sold count comes from, and whether it holds up. 14 of 131 is the promoter's own figure, from the quarterly progress report every registered project has to file. Nobody audits that. But they file a second, separate thing with the same authority: the building unit by unit. That list accounts for all 131 units and reaches the same answer — 14 sold, every one with money recorded as received against a named unit, and 81 still unsold. Two filings, made separately, agreeing to the unit. That is not an audit, but it is a good deal harder to fudge than one round number. Either way, this is only as current as the last change to the record, 27 April 2026.
- Is Raj Apoorvam registered with MahaRERA?
- Yes. It is registered as P52100016102, filed on 17 April 2018, and the registration is current. The authority's own record is the place to confirm that; this page restates it.
- When is Raj Apoorvam due to be handed over?
- The promoter has told MahaRERA December 2027. That is a declaration to the authority rather than a promise to a buyer; the date in your own agreement is the one that binds.
- Has Raj Apoorvam been delayed?
- Yes. The first date filed was December 2023. It now stands at December 2027, 4 years later.
- What did buyers actually pay in Raj Apoorvam?
- A median of ₹4,240 per square foot of carpet, across 11 sale agreements registered in this project. That is what was paid and stamped, not what is being asked.
- How many units are left in Raj Apoorvam?
- 81 of 131 were still unsold at the promoter's last filing, in 1 BHK, from 345–525 sq ft of carpet.
- Are there complaints against Raj Apoorvam?
- 2 cases have been filed with MahaRERA against this project. A complaint is an allegation that has been lodged, not a finding against the promoter.
- Who is building Raj Apoorvam?
- Crystal Landmark, as the promoter named on the registration.
Verify Government Filings Yourself
This dossier restates public records as filed on 23 October 2026. The authority's own registry page for P52100016102 carries sanctioned layout drawings, escrow accounts, quarterly progress filings, and title documents.
MahaRERA requires a CAPTCHA first. That is their verification gate, not a broken link.
Other projects in Chakan
- Due
- Dec 2028
- Units
- 58
- Carpet
- 165–548
- Typical unit
- ~₹23.8 lakh
Stock image
- Registered here
- ₹4,909
- On offer
- 1, 2 BHK
- Due
- Jul 2033
- Units
- 276
- Carpet
- 264–494
- Sold at
- ₹16.4 lakh
Stock image
- Registered here
- ₹5,518
- On offer
- 1 BHK
- Due
- Dec 2027
- Units
- 388
- Carpet
- 241–328
- Sold at
- ₹16.1 lakh