Is Mangalam Icon registered with MahaRERA?

Yes. It is registered as P52100029682, filed on 26 June 2021, and the registration is current. The authority's own record is the place to confirm that; this page restates it.

Has Mangalam Icon been handed over?

Yes. The completion date on the register is June 2025.

Has Mangalam Icon been delayed?

Yes. The first date filed was June 2024. It now stands at June 2025, a year later.

What did buyers actually pay in Mangalam Icon?

A median of ₹9,705 per square foot of carpet, across 6 sale agreements registered in this project. That is what was paid and stamped, not what is being asked.

How many units are left in Mangalam Icon?

39 of 47 were still unsold at the promoter's last filing, in 2, 3 BHK, from 301–968 sq ft of carpet.

Are there complaints against Mangalam Icon?

None appear against this project in the register. That covers cases filed with MahaRERA, and nothing about disputes settled elsewhere or never filed.

Who is building Mangalam Icon?

Ramdas Damodar Phuge proprietor of Bhagyalaxmi Construction, as the promoter named on the registration.

RERA registered P52100029682 Completed

Mangalam Icon

Bhosari, Pune · Residential / Group Housing by Ramdas Damodar Phuge proprietor of Bhagyalaxmi Construction

Official record Updated from the register 04 October 2026. Anything filed since then is not here yet.

In short

Mangalam Icon in Bhosari is MahaRERA-registered (P52100029682) and was handed over in June 2025. Buyers have already registered 6 sales here at a median ₹9,705 per sq ft of carpet — not an asking price. About 13% of the 47 units are sold. Ramdas Damodar Phuge proprietor of Bhagyalaxmi Construction is the promoter.

Stock image, not a photograph of Mangalam Icon — A stock photograph, not Mangalam Icon. We have no picture of this site yet.

Where this is

Bhosari, PCMC, Pune, 411039

Village: Bhosari
Taluka: Haveli
Pincode: 411039
Coordinates: 18.642371, 73.850692

Open in Maps Get directions Search Maps by name instead

The coordinates are the promoter's own, filed with MahaRERA. We have not checked them on the ground, and a filed pin is occasionally a few kilometres from the survey number on the same filing — if it does not look right, search by name.

Unit sizes on file

All 47 units are filed unit by unit with the authority, the highest on floor 7. Sizes are RERA carpet area — the floor you can actually walk on, not a built-up or saleable figure. The register holds them in square metres, so that figure is printed under each one: it is what you will see if you open the filing, and the square feet are our arithmetic on it.

2 BHK 28 units · 25 available

28 units 651 sq ft 60.49 sq m as filed

3 BHK 14 units · 11 available

14 units 968 sq ft 89.9 sq m as filed

Configuration not filed 5 units · 3 available

2 units 301 sq ft 27.94 sq m as filed

1 unit 347 sq ft 32.21 sq m as filed

1 unit 377 sq ft 35.03 sq m as filed

1 unit 379 sq ft 35.21 sq m as filed

Units sold

6 / 47

Early sales

13% absorption rate

Visual area guide See what the filed sizes feel like 2 generic footprints scaled from the registered carpet areas.

What each size looks like

Generic layouts, not this project's plans. Only the carpet area is from the register — the rooms are the usual shares of a unit that size, and where the promoter actually put the kitchen or which way the balcony faces is not filed anywhere. Read them for scale, which is the part that is arithmetic on the register: each room is drawn to its share of the area filed for that unit, and each unit to its size against the largest one drawn below.

2 BHK 28 units · 25 available

651 sq ft carpet as drawn

Carpet, filed: 651 sq ft
Built-up: about 781 sq ft
Super built-up: about 911 sq ft

Every room in this unit

Living and dining about 190 sq ft, Master bedroom about 126 sq ft, Second bedroom about 101 sq ft, Kitchen about 76 sq ft, Bath about 44 sq ft, Balcony about 44 sq ft, Second bath about 38 sq ft, Passage about 32 sq ft.

3 BHK 14 units · 11 available

968 sq ft carpet as drawn

Carpet, filed: 968 sq ft
Built-up: about 1,162 sq ft
Super built-up: about 1,355 sq ft

Every room in this unit

Living and dining about 238 sq ft, Master bedroom about 159 sq ft, Second bedroom about 127 sq ft, Third bedroom about 103 sq ft, Kitchen about 95 sq ft, Bath about 56 sq ft, Balcony about 56 sq ft, Second bath about 48 sq ft, Passage about 48 sq ft, Third bath about 40 sq ft.

The built-up and super built-up figures are ours, not the promoter's: carpet plus 20% and plus 40%, which is the usual Pune loading. A promoter can load more, and the number they quote is the one to check against the agreement. Which of the three you are actually buying, and why the register only records one of them, is in our guide to carpet against super built-up area.

What buyers actually paid

₹9,705 per sq ft of carpet, median of 6 registered sales

Range across those sales	₹7,751 to ₹10,176 per sq ft
Sold and booked	4 sold, 2 booked
Still available	39 units, 301–968 sq ft

A registered price is what a buyer contracted to pay, so it is the closest thing to a real number this market produces. It still is not a quote for you: these agreements were signed on different dates as the project progressed, floor and facing move the rate, and what a builder asks today may be higher or lower. Unsold units carry a government ready-reckoner valuation instead of a price, and that is a different thing, so it is not mixed into the figures above.

Timeline audit

Original proposed Jun 2024

Current status Handed over Jun 2025

Revised projection

The completion date has moved from June 2024 to June 2025, a year later, on the promoter's own revised filing.

Buyers who took possession late here may still have had a claim under section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, which entitles them to interest for every month of delay beyond the date in their agreement. More usefully for anyone buying today, this is a record of how this promoter performed against their own filed date.

Deep due diligence Open the complete registry dossier Land, promoter, complaints, title papers, plans and the raw MahaRERA record.

The land itself

Sector no 3 Plot no 65/3 is the plot this project is built on, as filed

Revenue village	Bhosari
Taluka	Haveli
Street, as filed	Sector 3 Plot no 65/3 Bhosari PCNTDA Pune
Bounded north by	Adjacent plot
Bounded east by	15 M wide road
Bounded south by	Adjacent plot
Bounded west by	Adjacent plot

Every promoter has to file the survey numbers of the land and what lies on each of its four sides. It is the driest thing on this page and the most useful if you are serious: the survey number is what the revenue record is keyed on, so it is what you quote to check the seven-twelve extract, and the boundaries are how you confirm on site that the plot you were shown is the plot that was registered.

"Street" is the register's own field name and promoters fill it with whatever they have — a road, a locality, sometimes the survey numbers again. It is printed as filed rather than tidied up.

Who is behind this project

Filed by the promoter with MahaRERA.

Promoter on the register	Ramdas Damodar Phuge proprietor of Bhagyalaxmi Construction
Registered office	S No 690, Phuge Building, Pune Nashik Road, Bhosari, Pune 411039

Professionals named on the filing

Architect	Architect Vipul Pagariya
Architect	Vipul Pagariya CA 47990/2010
Engineer	Hitesh Lahoti Structural Engineers PCMC91
Engineer	Vikrant Gavhane
Chartered Accountant	Amruta Shinde 154817
Chartered Accountant	Amruta Shinde and Associates
Chartered Accountant	VSAP and Company
Chartered Accountant	Vikas Khadsare 154672

The promoter appoints these, and MahaRERA requires the architect and engineer to certify progress before money can be drawn from the project account. A name that recurs across several of a builder's projects is normal; one that recurs across several lapsed ones is worth a question.

Title and ownership papers

21 June 2021 is when an advocate last certified the title to this land

Title report 1mb Latest Search Title Report070621.pdf	21 June 2021
Promoter's declaration, Form B Self declaration Form B Icon for extension.pdf	23 May 2024 1 older version on file

No project reaches the register without an advocate's report on the title to its land, so a title report on file is the floor and not a distinction. What the date tells you is how recently somebody qualified looked. What none of it tells you is whether the title is clear: a report can record an objection, a pending suit or a missing consent and still be a perfectly valid filing, and nothing here reads the contents of the document.

So read it yourself before you pay a booking amount, and read the newest one. Every document above is on the authority's page for this project, under the filename shown — the link is in Check this yourself. What to look for in each one, and what having it on file does not prove, is set out in our guide to a project's title papers.

RERA filing records

View all

Every figure here is the authority's, not ours, as of the date at the top of this page. This is the raw record, reproduced without alteration.

Field	As filed with MahaRERA
Registration number	P52100029682
Promoter	Ramdas Damodar Phuge proprietor of Bhagyalaxmi Construction
Project type	Residential / Group Housing · Building development
Locality	Bhosari — Haveli taluka, pincode 411039
Applied on	17 June 2021
Registered on	26 June 2021
Completion, as first filed	30 June 2024
Handed over	29 June 2025 a year later
Units declared	47
Units sold	6 of 47 sold (13%), 41 still unsold
Complaints	0 on record with MahaRERA
Certificate on file	Original registration certificate, issued 26 June 2021
Application reference	REA52100090774
Current status	Completed
Record last changed	30 September 2024 · over 2 years ago

Where the sold count comes from, and whether it holds up. 6 of 47 is the promoter's own figure, from the quarterly progress report every registered project has to file. Nobody audits that. But they file a second, separate thing with the same authority: the building unit by unit. That list accounts for all 47 units and reaches the same answer — 4 sold, every one with money recorded as received against a named unit, 2 booked with a price agreed but nothing received yet, and 39 still unsold. Two filings, made separately, agreeing to the unit. That is not an audit, but it is a good deal harder to fudge than one round number. Either way, this is only as current as the last change to the record, 30 September 2024.

Common questions

Is Mangalam Icon registered with MahaRERA?: Yes. It is registered as P52100029682, filed on 26 June 2021, and the registration is current. The authority's own record is the place to confirm that; this page restates it.
Has Mangalam Icon been handed over?: Yes. The completion date on the register is June 2025.
Has Mangalam Icon been delayed?: Yes. The first date filed was June 2024. It now stands at June 2025, a year later.
What did buyers actually pay in Mangalam Icon?: A median of ₹9,705 per square foot of carpet, across 6 sale agreements registered in this project. That is what was paid and stamped, not what is being asked.
How many units are left in Mangalam Icon?: 39 of 47 were still unsold at the promoter's last filing, in 2, 3 BHK, from 301–968 sq ft of carpet.
Are there complaints against Mangalam Icon?: None appear against this project in the register. That covers cases filed with MahaRERA, and nothing about disputes settled elsewhere or never filed.
Who is building Mangalam Icon?: Ramdas Damodar Phuge proprietor of Bhagyalaxmi Construction, as the promoter named on the registration.

Check this yourself

This page restates one public record as we read it on 04 October 2026. The authority's own page for P52100029682 carries more that we do not republish: the registration certificate, every quarterly progress report, the sanctioned plans, parking allocation, the project bank account, and any declared litigation.

Open on MahaRERA Or search the register

MahaRERA will ask you to type a CAPTCHA first. That is their gate, not a broken link — and it is the reason this page exists, because a register you have to solve a puzzle to read one project at a time is not one anybody comparing four projects will actually use.