RERA registered P52100076699 Active
Kshitij Apartment
Punawale, Pune · Residential / Group Housing by Siddhhidata Developer
Official record Updated from the register 30 October 2026. Anything filed since then is not here yet.
In short
Kshitij Apartment in Punawale is MahaRERA-registered (P52100076699). Possession was filed for October 2026, and that date has passed without a handover on the register. Buyers have already registered 5 sales here at a median ₹8,933 per sq ft of carpet — not an asking price. About 33% of the 18 units are sold. Siddhhidata Developer is the promoter.
- Sold here at
- ₹8,933
- per sq ft, 5 registered sales
- Available
- 2 BHK
- 2 left · 683 sq ft
- Was due
- Oct 2026
- 1 days past its date, not handed over
Punawale, PCMC, Pune, 411033
The coordinates are the promoter's own, filed with MahaRERA. We have not checked them on the ground, and a filed pin is occasionally a few kilometres from the survey number on the same filing — if it does not look right, search by name.
Flat sizes on file
All 18 flats are filed unit by unit with the authority, the highest on floor 5. Sizes are RERA carpet area — the floor you can actually walk on, not a built-up or saleable figure. The register holds them in square metres, so that figure is printed under each one: it is what you will see if you open the filing, and the square feet are our arithmetic on it.
1 BHK Residences
2 BHK Residences
Carpet Area vs. Loading Factor Arithmetic
How statutory carpet translates to standard Pune market quoted areas (+20% Built-up, +40% Super Built-up)
| Unit Configuration | Statutory RERA Carpet (Actual) | Approx Built-up (+20%) | Super Built-up (+40% Loading) | Available Inventory |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 BHK | 448 sq ft (41.62 sq m) | ~538 sq ft | ~627 sq ft | 0 left of 4 |
| 2 BHK | 588 – 683 sq ft (54.67 – 63.44 sq m) | ~706 – 820 sq ft | ~823 – 956 sq ft | 2 left of 14 |
6 / 18
33% absorption rate
Visual area guide See what the filed sizes feel like 2 generic footprints scaled from the registered carpet areas.
What each size looks like
Generic layouts, not this project's plans. Only the carpet area is from the register — the rooms are the usual shares of a flat that size, and where the promoter actually put the kitchen or which way the balcony faces is not filed anywhere. Read them for scale, which is the part that is arithmetic on the register: each room is drawn to its share of the area filed for that flat, and each flat to its size against the largest one drawn below.
1 BHK 4 flats · none available
448 sq ft carpet as drawn
- Carpet, filed
- 448 sq ft
- Built-up
- about 538 sq ft
- Super built-up
- about 627 sq ft
Every room in this flat
Living and dining about 168 sq ft, Master bedroom about 112 sq ft, Kitchen about 67 sq ft, Bath about 39 sq ft, Balcony about 39 sq ft, Passage about 22 sq ft.
2 BHK 14 flats · 2 available
588 sq ft carpet as drawn, from 588–683 sq ft filed in this configuration
- Carpet, filed
- 588 sq ft
- Built-up
- about 706 sq ft
- Super built-up
- about 823 sq ft
Every room in this flat
Living and dining about 171 sq ft, Master bedroom about 114 sq ft, Second bedroom about 91 sq ft, Kitchen about 69 sq ft, Bath about 40 sq ft, Balcony about 40 sq ft, Second bath about 34 sq ft, Passage about 29 sq ft.
The built-up and super built-up figures are ours, not the promoter's: carpet plus 20% and plus 40%, which is the usual Pune loading. A promoter can load more, and the number they quote is the one to check against the agreement. Which of the three you are actually buying, and why the register only records one of them, is in our guide to carpet against super built-up area.
What buyers actually paid
| Range across those sales | ₹8,929 to ₹9,375 per sq ft |
|---|---|
| Sold and booked | 5 sold, 1 booked |
| Still available | 2 flats, 448–683 sq ft |
A registered price is what a buyer contracted to pay, so it is the closest thing to a real number this market produces. It still is not a quote for you: these agreements were signed on different dates as the project progressed, floor and facing move the rate, and what a builder asks today may be higher or lower. Unsold flats carry a government ready-reckoner valuation instead of a price, and that is a different thing, so it is not mixed into the figures above.
1 further sale is set aside. It divides out beyond ₹22,327 per sq ft, more than two and a half times this project's own median. A flat does not cost that much more than its neighbours on the same price list, so the usual cause is a carpet area filed too small for the agreement value printed beside it. Both figures are on the register exactly as shown — you can check them in the register itself — but no rate is computed from them here. Counted rather than quietly dropped.
Past handover deadline
The filing date of October 2026 has passed without completion being certified on the register (1 days past its date ago).
Under section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, a buyer whose possession is delayed beyond the date in the agreement may withdraw and claim a refund with interest, or stay and claim interest for every month of delay. That right attaches to the date in your agreement, not the date on this page.
Deep due diligence Open the complete registry dossier Land, promoter, complaints, title papers, plans and the raw MahaRERA record.
The land itself
| Revenue village | Pimpri Chinchawad (M Corp.) · shown on this site as Punawale |
|---|---|
| Taluka | Haveli |
| Street, as filed | Chinchwad |
| Bounded north by | By Plot No 74 and 75 |
| Bounded east by | By Plot No 30 |
| Bounded south by | By 30 W colony road |
| Bounded west by | By Plot No 28 |
Every promoter has to file the survey numbers of the land and what lies on each of its four sides. It is the driest thing on this page and the most useful if you are serious: the survey number is what the revenue record is keyed on, so it is what you quote to check the seven-twelve extract, and the boundaries are how you confirm on site that the plot you were shown is the plot that was registered.
"Street" is the register's own field name and promoters fill it with whatever they have — a road, a locality, sometimes the survey numbers again. It is printed as filed rather than tidied up.
Who is behind this project
Filed by the promoter with MahaRERA.
| Promoter on the register | Siddhhidata Developer |
|---|---|
| Registered office | Flat No 302, 302, 15 Premlok Apartment, Chinchwad, Pune 411033 |
Professionals named on the filing
| Architect | Ar Amit Sawalakhe CA/2011/53145 |
|---|---|
| Engineer | Mr Sujit Dashrath |
| Chartered Accountant | CA P G Agrawal and Co 173577 |
The promoter appoints these, and MahaRERA requires the architect and engineer to certify progress before money can be drawn from the project account. A name that recurs across several of a builder's projects is normal; one that recurs across several lapsed ones is worth a question.
Title and ownership papers
| Title report Format A- Kshitij.pdf | 8 June 2024 1 older version on file |
|---|---|
| Promoter's declaration, Form B Form B- Kshitij LO.pdf | 8 June 2024 |
No project reaches the register without an advocate's report on the title to its land, so a title report on file is the floor and not a distinction. What the date tells you is how recently somebody qualified looked. What none of it tells you is whether the title is clear: a report can record an objection, a pending suit or a missing consent and still be a perfectly valid filing, and nothing here reads the contents of the document.
So read it yourself before you pay a booking amount, and read the newest one. Every document above is on the authority's page for this project, under the filename shown — the link is in Check this yourself. What to look for in each one, and what having it on file does not prove, is set out in our guide to a project's title papers.
RERA filing records
View allEvery figure here is the authority's, not ours, as of the date at the top of this page. This is the raw record, reproduced without alteration.
| Field | As filed with MahaRERA |
|---|---|
| Registration number | P52100076699 |
| Promoter | Siddhhidata Developer |
| Project type | Residential / Group Housing · Building development |
| Locality | Punawale — Haveli taluka, pincode 411033 |
| Applied on | 10 June 2024 |
| Registered on | 21 June 2024 |
| Completion, as first filed | 30 June 2026 |
| Was due | 30 October 2026 4 months later |
| Units declared | 18 |
| Units sold | 6 of 18 sold (33%), 12 still unsold |
| Complaints | 0 on record with MahaRERA |
| Certificate on file | Original registration certificate, issued 21 June 2024 |
| Application reference | REA52100162936 |
| Current status | Active |
| Record last changed | 21 June 2024 · over 2 years ago 2 years untouched |
Where the sold count comes from, and whether it holds up. 6 of 18 is the promoter's own figure, from the quarterly progress report every registered project has to file. Nobody audits that. But they file a second, separate thing with the same authority: the building unit by unit. That list accounts for all 18 flats and reaches the same answer — 5 sold, every one with money recorded as received against a named flat, 1 booked with a price agreed but nothing received yet, and 2 still unsold. Two filings, made separately, agreeing to the unit. That is not an audit, but it is a good deal harder to fudge than one round number. Either way, this is only as current as the last change to the record, 21 June 2024.
MahaRERA has not recorded a change to this project's record in 2 years, while still listing it as under construction. That date moves on status changes and system updates as well as on anything the promoter files, so it is not proof the site is idle — but on a project still being sold, it is worth asking the promoter what has been filed since.
- Is Kshitij Apartment registered with MahaRERA?
- Yes. It is registered as P52100076699, filed on 21 June 2024, and the registration is current. The authority's own record is the place to confirm that; this page restates it.
- When was Kshitij Apartment due to be handed over?
- October 2026, and that date has passed without a handover being filed — 1 days ago. Section 18 of the Act gives an allottee a remedy when a promoter misses the date in the agreement.
- What did buyers actually pay in Kshitij Apartment?
- A median of ₹8,933 per square foot of carpet, across 5 sale agreements registered in this project. That is what was paid and stamped, not what is being asked.
- How many flats are left in Kshitij Apartment?
- 2 of 18 were still unsold at the promoter's last filing, in 2 BHK, from 683 sq ft of carpet.
- Are there complaints against Kshitij Apartment?
- None appear against this project in the register. That covers cases filed with MahaRERA, and nothing about disputes settled elsewhere or never filed.
- Who is building Kshitij Apartment?
- Siddhhidata Developer, as the promoter named on the registration.
Verify Government Filings Yourself
This dossier restates public records as filed on 30 October 2026. The authority's own registry page for P52100076699 carries sanctioned layout drawings, escrow accounts, quarterly progress filings, and title documents.
MahaRERA requires a CAPTCHA first. That is their verification gate, not a broken link.
Other projects in Punawale
Stock image
- Registered here
- ₹10,942
- On offer
- 2, 3 BHK
- Due
- Oct 2028
- Units
- 22
- Carpet
- 522–1,050
- Sold at
- ₹1.1 crore
Stock image
- Registered here
- ₹7,260
- On offer
- 2 BHK + shops
11 complaints
- Due
- Dec 2026
- Units
- 193
- Carpet
- 618–646
- Sold at
- ₹44.9 lakh
Stock image
- Registered here
- ₹10,484
- On offer
- 2, 3, 4 BHK +2 more
1 complaint
- Due
- Dec 2026
- Units
- 559
- Carpet
- 240–5,796
- Sold at
- ₹1.1 crore