RERA registered P52100035173 Active
Geetvan
Pirangut, Pune · Others by M/S Shilp Properties
Official record Updated from the register 16 September 2026. Anything filed since then is not here yet.
In short
Geetvan in Pirangut is MahaRERA-registered (P52100035173) and still under construction, with possession filed for March 2029. Buyers have already registered 89 sales here at a median ₹5,174 per sq ft of carpet — not an asking price. About 91% of the 100 units are sold. M/S Shilp Properties is the promoter.
- Sold here at
- ₹5,174
- per sq ft, 89 registered sales
- Available
- 1 Room Kitchen, 2 BHK
- 9 left · 311–702 sq ft
- Now due
- Mar 2029
- 4 years later than first promised
Where this is
Pirangut, PMRDA, Pune, 412115
The coordinates are the promoter's own, filed with MahaRERA. We have not checked them on the ground, and a filed pin is occasionally a few kilometres from the survey number on the same filing — if it does not look right, search by name.
Flat sizes on file
All 100 flats are filed unit by unit with the authority, the highest on floor 10. Sizes are RERA carpet area — the floor you can actually walk on, not a built-up or saleable figure. The register holds them in square metres, so that figure is printed under each one: it is what you will see if you open the filing, and the square feet are our arithmetic on it.
1 Room Kitchen 10 units · 7 available
1 BHK 18 units · all sold
2 BHK 72 units · 2 available
91 / 100
91% absorption rate
Visual area guide See what the filed sizes feel like 3 generic footprints scaled from the registered carpet areas.
What each size looks like
Generic layouts, not this project's plans. Only the carpet area is from the register — the rooms are the usual shares of a flat that size, and where the promoter actually put the kitchen or which way the balcony faces is not filed anywhere. Read them for scale, which is the part that is arithmetic on the register: each room is drawn to its share of the area filed for that flat, and each flat to its size against the largest one drawn below.
1 Room Kitchen 10 flats · 7 available
329 sq ft carpet as drawn, from 272–564 sq ft filed in this configuration
- Carpet, filed
- 329 sq ft
- Built-up
- about 395 sq ft
- Super built-up
- about 461 sq ft
Every room in this flat
Living and sleeping about 197 sq ft, Kitchen about 66 sq ft, Bath about 36 sq ft, Balcony about 30 sq ft.
1 BHK 18 flats · none available
531 sq ft carpet as drawn, from 531–541 sq ft filed in this configuration
- Carpet, filed
- 531 sq ft
- Built-up
- about 637 sq ft
- Super built-up
- about 743 sq ft
Every room in this flat
Living and dining about 199 sq ft, Master bedroom about 133 sq ft, Kitchen about 80 sq ft, Bath about 46 sq ft, Balcony about 46 sq ft, Passage about 27 sq ft.
2 BHK 72 flats · 2 available
697 sq ft carpet as drawn, from 534–705 sq ft filed in this configuration
- Carpet, filed
- 697 sq ft
- Built-up
- about 836 sq ft
- Super built-up
- about 976 sq ft
Every room in this flat
Living and dining about 203 sq ft, Master bedroom about 135 sq ft, Second bedroom about 108 sq ft, Kitchen about 81 sq ft, Bath about 47 sq ft, Balcony about 47 sq ft, Second bath about 41 sq ft, Passage about 34 sq ft.
The built-up and super built-up figures are ours, not the promoter's: carpet plus 20% and plus 40%, which is the usual Pune loading. A promoter can load more, and the number they quote is the one to check against the agreement. Which of the three you are actually buying, and why the register only records one of them, is in our guide to carpet against super built-up area.
What buyers actually paid
| Range across those sales | ₹4,666 to ₹7,569 per sq ft |
|---|---|
| Sold and booked | 91 sold, 0 booked |
| Still available | 9 flats, 272–705 sq ft |
A registered price is what a buyer contracted to pay, so it is the closest thing to a real number this market produces. It still is not a quote for you: these agreements were signed on different dates as the project progressed, floor and facing move the rate, and what a builder asks today may be higher or lower. Unsold flats carry a government ready-reckoner valuation instead of a price, and that is a different thing, so it is not mixed into the figures above.
2 further sales are set aside. They divide out beyond ₹12,946 per sq ft, more than two and a half times this project's own median. A flat does not cost that much more than its neighbours on the same price list, so the usual cause is a carpet area filed too small for the agreement value printed beside it. Both figures are on the register exactly as shown — you can check them in the register itself — but no rate is computed from them here. Counted rather than quietly dropped.
Timeline audit
Revised projection
The completion date has moved from March 2025 to March 2029, 4 years later, on the promoter's own revised filing.
Under section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, a buyer whose possession is delayed beyond the date in the agreement may withdraw and claim a refund with interest, or stay and claim interest for every month of delay. That right attaches to the date in your agreement, not the date on this page.
Deep due diligence Open the complete registry dossier Land, promoter, complaints, title papers, plans and the raw MahaRERA record.
The land itself
| Revenue village | Pirangut |
|---|---|
| Taluka | Mulshi |
| Street, as filed | PIRANGUT |
| Bounded north by | GAT NO 1226 27 A 4 PLOT B |
| Bounded east by | INTERNAL ROAD |
| Bounded south by | 60 M ROAD |
| Bounded west by | GAT NO 1221 2 |
Every promoter has to file the survey numbers of the land and what lies on each of its four sides. It is the driest thing on this page and the most useful if you are serious: the survey number is what the revenue record is keyed on, so it is what you quote to check the seven-twelve extract, and the boundaries are how you confirm on site that the plot you were shown is the plot that was registered.
"Street" is the register's own field name and promoters fill it with whatever they have — a road, a locality, sometimes the survey numbers again. It is printed as filed rather than tidied up.
Who is behind this project
Filed by the promoter with MahaRERA.
| Promoter on the register | M/S Shilp Properties |
|---|---|
| Registered office | Cts No 567, 567, Plot No 128, Dahanukar Colony, Lane No 04, Kothrud, Pune 411038 |
Professionals named on the filing
| Architect | Ar Vikas Achalkar CA/94/17606 |
|---|---|
| Engineer | Mr Amit Rupankar |
| Engineer | Nitin S Patel |
| Engineer | Rohinee Engineers PCMC/LE/0651/201 |
| Chartered Accountant | CA Nikita Bajaj |
| Chartered Accountant | Chetan Parakh 112165 |
| Chartered Accountant | Siddhant Bora 614922 |
The promoter appoints these, and MahaRERA requires the architect and engineer to certify progress before money can be drawn from the project account. A name that recurs across several of a builder's projects is normal; one that recurs across several lapsed ones is worth a question.
Title and ownership papers
| Title report Patel Search format page 1.pdf | 21 April 2022 1 older version on file |
|---|---|
| Promoter's declaration, Form B FORM B0001.pdf | 21 April 2022 |
No project reaches the register without an advocate's report on the title to its land, so a title report on file is the floor and not a distinction. What the date tells you is how recently somebody qualified looked. What none of it tells you is whether the title is clear: a report can record an objection, a pending suit or a missing consent and still be a perfectly valid filing, and nothing here reads the contents of the document.
So read it yourself before you pay a booking amount, and read the newest one. Every document above is on the authority's page for this project, under the filename shown — the link is in Check this yourself. What to look for in each one, and what having it on file does not prove, is set out in our guide to a project's title papers.
RERA filing records
View allEvery figure here is the authority's, not ours, as of the date at the top of this page. This is the raw record, reproduced without alteration.
| Field | As filed with MahaRERA |
|---|---|
| Registration number | P52100035173 |
| Promoter | M/S Shilp Properties |
| Project type | Others · Building development |
| Locality | Pirangut — Mulshi taluka, pincode 412115 |
| Applied on | 22 April 2022 |
| Registered on | 10 May 2022 |
| Completion, as first filed | 31 March 2025 |
| Due | 31 March 2029 4 years later |
| Units declared | 100 |
| Units sold | 91 of 100 sold (91%), 9 still unsold |
| Complaints | 0 on record with MahaRERA |
| Certificate on file | Original registration certificate, issued 30 October 2023 |
| Application reference | REA52100107077 |
| Current status | Active |
| Record last changed | 07 April 2025 · 17 months ago |
Where the sold count comes from, and whether it holds up. 91 of 100 is the promoter's own figure, from the quarterly progress report every registered project has to file. Nobody audits that. But they file a second, separate thing with the same authority: the building unit by unit. That list accounts for all 100 flats and reaches the same answer — 91 sold, every one with money recorded as received against a named flat, and 9 still unsold. Two filings, made separately, agreeing to the unit. That is not an audit, but it is a good deal harder to fudge than one round number. Either way, this is only as current as the last change to the record, 07 April 2025.
Common questions
- Is Geetvan registered with MahaRERA?
- Yes. It is registered as P52100035173, filed on 10 May 2022, and the registration is current. The authority's own record is the place to confirm that; this page restates it.
- When is Geetvan due to be handed over?
- The promoter has told MahaRERA March 2029. That is a declaration to the authority rather than a promise to a buyer; the date in your own agreement is the one that binds.
- Has Geetvan been delayed?
- Yes. The first date filed was March 2025. It now stands at March 2029, 4 years later.
- What did buyers actually pay in Geetvan?
- A median of ₹5,174 per square foot of carpet, across 89 sale agreements registered in this project. That is what was paid and stamped, not what is being asked.
- How many flats are left in Geetvan?
- 9 of 100 were still unsold at the promoter's last filing, in 2 BHK + 1 RK, from 311–702 sq ft of carpet.
- Are there complaints against Geetvan?
- None appear against this project in the register. That covers cases filed with MahaRERA, and nothing about disputes settled elsewhere or never filed.
- Who is building Geetvan?
- M/S Shilp Properties, as the promoter named on the registration.
Check this yourself
This page restates one public record as we read it on 16 September 2026. The authority's own page for P52100035173 carries more that we do not republish: the registration certificate, every quarterly progress report, the sanctioned plans, parking allocation, the project bank account, and any declared litigation.
MahaRERA will ask you to type a CAPTCHA first. That is their gate, not a broken link — and it is the reason this page exists, because a register you have to solve a puzzle to read one project at a time is not one anybody comparing four projects will actually use.
Other projects in Pirangut
Stock image
- Nearby
- ₹5,935–6,006
- On offer
- 1, 2 BHK
- Due
- Dec 2029
- Units
- 127
- Carpet
- 582–890
- Typical flat
- ~₹45.4 lakh
Stock image
- Due
- Apr 2028
- Units
- 8
- Carpet
- —
- Typical unit
- —
Stock image
- Registered here
- ₹6,286
- On offer
- 2, 3 BHK
1 complaint
- Due
- Apr 2027
- Units
- 48
- Carpet
- 1,175–1,410
- Sold at
- ₹74.1 lakh