Z Zomefy

RERA registered P52100017897 Active

The Grand

Ambegaon Budruk, Pune · Others by Venkateshwara Construction

Official record Updated from the register 16 September 2026. Anything filed since then is not here yet.

In short

The Grand in Ambegaon Budruk is MahaRERA-registered (P52100017897) and still under construction, with possession filed for December 2027. Buyers have already registered 51 sales here at a median ₹7,458 per sq ft of carpet — not an asking price. About 39% of the 132 units are sold. 24 complaints sit on the filing. Venkateshwara Construction is the promoter.

Stock image, not a photograph of The Grand Stock image
Where
Ambegaon Budruk
pincode 411046
Sold here at
₹7,458
per sq ft, 51 registered sales
Available
1, 2 BHK
80 left · 329–619 sq ft
Now due
Dec 2027
4 years later than first promised
A stock photograph, not The Grand. We have no picture of this site yet.

Where this is

Ambegaon Budruk, PMC, Pune, 411046

Village
AMBEGAON Bk
Taluka
Haveli
Pincode
411046

No coordinate was filed for this project, so this searches Maps by name and locality rather than dropping a pin we cannot vouch for.

Flat sizes on file

All 132 flats are filed unit by unit with the authority, the highest on floor 11. Sizes are RERA carpet area — the floor you can actually walk on, not a built-up or saleable figure. The register holds them in square metres, so that figure is printed under each one: it is what you will see if you open the filing, and the square feet are our arithmetic on it.

1 BHK 86 units · 50 available

2 units 329 sq ft 30.53 sq m as filed
18 units 350 sq ft 32.47 sq m as filed
18 units 371 sq ft 34.44–34.46 sq m as filed
22 units 387 sq ft 35.92–35.95 sq m as filed
17 units 405 sq ft 37.62–37.65 sq m as filed
2 units 423 sq ft 39.29 sq m as filed
4 units 439 sq ft 40.77 sq m as filed
1 unit 487 sq ft 45.21 sq m as filed
1 unit 503 sq ft 46.75 sq m as filed
1 unit 505 sq ft 46.89 sq m as filed

2 BHK 43 units · 27 available

2 units 447 sq ft 41.49 sq m as filed
17 units 487 sq ft 45.21–45.23 sq m as filed
7 units 503 sq ft 46.75 sq m as filed
9 units 505 sq ft 46.89 sq m as filed
2 units 533 sq ft 49.55 sq m as filed
1 unit 561 sq ft 52.13 sq m as filed
1 unit 565 sq ft 52.53 sq m as filed
2 units 600 sq ft 55.75 sq m as filed
2 units 619 sq ft 57.53 sq m as filed

Configuration not filed 3 units · all available

3 units have no usable carpet area on file, so they are counted above but not drawn.

Units sold

52 / 132

Early sales

39% absorption rate

Visual area guide See what the filed sizes feel like 2 generic footprints scaled from the registered carpet areas.

What each size looks like

Generic layouts, not this project's plans. Only the carpet area is from the register — the rooms are the usual shares of a flat that size, and where the promoter actually put the kitchen or which way the balcony faces is not filed anywhere. Read them for scale, which is the part that is arithmetic on the register: each room is drawn to its share of the area filed for that flat, and each flat to its size against the largest one drawn below.

1 BHK 86 flats · 50 available

387 sq ft carpet as drawn, from 329–505 sq ft filed in this configuration

Carpet, filed
387 sq ft
Built-up
about 464 sq ft
Super built-up
about 542 sq ft
Every room in this flat

Living and dining about 145 sq ft, Master bedroom about 97 sq ft, Kitchen about 58 sq ft, Bath about 34 sq ft, Balcony about 34 sq ft, Passage about 19 sq ft.

2 BHK 43 flats · 27 available

487 sq ft carpet as drawn, from 447–619 sq ft filed in this configuration

Carpet, filed
487 sq ft
Built-up
about 584 sq ft
Super built-up
about 682 sq ft
Every room in this flat

Living and dining about 142 sq ft, Master bedroom about 95 sq ft, Second bedroom about 76 sq ft, Kitchen about 57 sq ft, Bath about 33 sq ft, Balcony about 33 sq ft, Second bath about 28 sq ft, Passage about 24 sq ft.

The built-up and super built-up figures are ours, not the promoter's: carpet plus 20% and plus 40%, which is the usual Pune loading. A promoter can load more, and the number they quote is the one to check against the agreement. Which of the three you are actually buying, and why the register only records one of them, is in our guide to carpet against super built-up area.

What buyers actually paid

₹7,458 per sq ft of carpet, median of 51 registered sales
Range across those sales ₹5,917 to ₹9,728 per sq ft
Sold and booked 52 sold, 0 booked
Still available 80 flats, 329–619 sq ft

A registered price is what a buyer contracted to pay, so it is the closest thing to a real number this market produces. It still is not a quote for you: these agreements were signed on different dates as the project progressed, floor and facing move the rate, and what a builder asks today may be higher or lower. Unsold flats carry a government ready-reckoner valuation instead of a price, and that is a different thing, so it is not mixed into the figures above.

1 further sale is set aside. It divides out beyond ₹18,688 per sq ft, more than two and a half times this project's own median. A flat does not cost that much more than its neighbours on the same price list, so the usual cause is a carpet area filed too small for the agreement value printed beside it. Both figures are on the register exactly as shown — you can check them in the register itself — but no rate is computed from them here. Counted rather than quietly dropped.

Timeline audit

Original proposed Dec 2023
Current status Due Dec 2027

Revised projection

The completion date has moved from December 2023 to December 2027, 4 years later, on the promoter's own revised filing.

Under section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, a buyer whose possession is delayed beyond the date in the agreement may withdraw and claim a refund with interest, or stay and claim interest for every month of delay. That right attaches to the date in your agreement, not the date on this page.

Advertisement
Deep due diligence Open the complete registry dossier Land, promoter, complaints, title papers, plans and the raw MahaRERA record.

The land itself

4/25 , 4/26/2 is the plot this project is built on, as filed
Revenue village AMBEGAON Bk · shown on this site as Ambegaon Budruk
TalukaHaveli
Street, as filed NR KATRAJ BIPASS
Bounded north by ADJ S NO 04 PART
Bounded east by ADJ S NO 04 PART
Bounded south by ADJ S NO 04 PART
Bounded west by ADJ S NO 04 PART

All four boundaries are filed as the same thing, which satisfies the form without locating the plot. It is not a warning about the project — the survey number above does the locating — but it does mean the four rows here tell you one fact rather than four.

Every promoter has to file the survey numbers of the land and what lies on each of its four sides. It is the driest thing on this page and the most useful if you are serious: the survey number is what the revenue record is keyed on, so it is what you quote to check the seven-twelve extract, and the boundaries are how you confirm on site that the plot you were shown is the plot that was registered.

"Street" is the register's own field name and promoters fill it with whatever they have — a road, a locality, sometimes the survey numbers again. It is printed as filed rather than tidied up.

Who is behind this project

Filed by the promoter with MahaRERA.

Promoter on the registerVenkateshwara Construction
Registered officeA-505, Balaji Park, Bhumkar Nagar, Pune 411046

Professionals named on the filing

Architect S D Walhekar
Engineer firzon modi 00000
Chartered Accountant Ibrahim Shaikh 147308

The promoter appoints these, and MahaRERA requires the architect and engineer to certify progress before money can be drawn from the project account. A name that recurs across several of a builder's projects is normal; one that recurs across several lapsed ones is worth a question.

Complaints filed with MahaRERA

24 cases against this project, 23 with an order on record, filed between Apr 2023 and Apr 2026. Complainants' names are published by the authority; we leave them out. Quote the case number to look one up.

Case numberFiledOutcome
CC12602037 Apr 2026 No order on record
CC12504249 Dec 2025 Order passed Dec 2025
CC12400815 Nov 2024 Order passed Nov 2024
CC005000000269361 Nov 2023 Order passed Nov 2023
CC005000000269671 Oct 2023 Order passed Oct 2023
CC005000000259171 Aug 2023 Order passed Aug 2023
CC005000000259172 Aug 2023 Order passed Aug 2023
CC005000000259173 Aug 2023 Order passed Aug 2023
CC005000000259174 Aug 2023 Order passed Aug 2023
CC005000000259175 Aug 2023 Order passed Aug 2023
Show the remaining 14 cases
CC005000000258930 Aug 2023 Order passed Aug 2023
CC005000000238690 Apr 2023 Order passed Apr 2023
CC005000000238679 Apr 2023 Order passed Apr 2023
CC005000000238680 Apr 2023 Order passed Apr 2023
CC005000000238681 Apr 2023 Order passed Apr 2023
CC005000000238682 Apr 2023 Order passed Apr 2023
CC005000000238683 Apr 2023 Order passed Apr 2023
CC005000000238684 Apr 2023 Order passed Apr 2023
CC005000000238685 Apr 2023 Order passed Apr 2023
CC005000000238686 Apr 2023 Order passed Apr 2023
CC005000000238687 Apr 2023 Order passed Apr 2023
CC005000000238688 Apr 2023 Order passed Apr 2023
CC005000000238689 Apr 2023 Order passed Apr 2023
CC005000000238678 Apr 2023 Order passed Apr 2023

A complaint is not proof of wrongdoing, and a project with none is not necessarily well run — most buyers never file. What the pattern shows is whether disputes here reached the regulator and whether they were decided.

Title and ownership papers

31 August 2018 is when an advocate last certified the title to this land
Title report SEARCH.pdf 31 August 2018
Promoter's declaration, Form B P52100017897_FileName_1-1_page-0001.pdf 19 February 2025 4 older versions on file

No project reaches the register without an advocate's report on the title to its land, so a title report on file is the floor and not a distinction. What the date tells you is how recently somebody qualified looked. What none of it tells you is whether the title is clear: a report can record an objection, a pending suit or a missing consent and still be a perfectly valid filing, and nothing here reads the contents of the document.

So read it yourself before you pay a booking amount, and read the newest one. Every document above is on the authority's page for this project, under the filename shown — the link is in Check this yourself. What to look for in each one, and what having it on file does not prove, is set out in our guide to a project's title papers.

RERA filing records

View all

Every figure here is the authority's, not ours, as of the date at the top of this page. This is the raw record, reproduced without alteration.

FieldAs filed with MahaRERA
Registration numberP52100017897
Promoter Venkateshwara Construction
Project typeOthers · Building development
LocalityAmbegaon Budruk — Haveli taluka, pincode 411046
Applied on08 September 2018
Registered on25 September 2018
Completion, as first filed30 December 2023
Due31 December 2027 4 years later
Units declared132
Units sold 52 of 132 sold (39%), 80 still unsold
Complaints24 on record with MahaRERA
Certificate on file Original registration certificate, issued 09 September 2021
Application referenceREA52100042898
Current statusActive
Record last changed 28 February 2025 · 19 months ago

Where the sold count comes from, and whether it holds up. 52 of 132 is the promoter's own figure, from the quarterly progress report every registered project has to file. Nobody audits that. But they file a second, separate thing with the same authority: the building unit by unit. That list accounts for all 132 flats and reaches the same answer — 52 sold, every one with money recorded as received against a named flat, and 80 still unsold. Two filings, made separately, agreeing to the unit. That is not an audit, but it is a good deal harder to fudge than one round number. Either way, this is only as current as the last change to the record, 28 February 2025.

Common questions

Is The Grand registered with MahaRERA?
Yes. It is registered as P52100017897, filed on 25 September 2018, and the registration is current. The authority's own record is the place to confirm that; this page restates it.
When is The Grand due to be handed over?
The promoter has told MahaRERA December 2027. That is a declaration to the authority rather than a promise to a buyer; the date in your own agreement is the one that binds.
Has The Grand been delayed?
Yes. The first date filed was December 2023. It now stands at December 2027, 4 years later.
What did buyers actually pay in The Grand?
A median of ₹7,458 per square foot of carpet, across 51 sale agreements registered in this project. That is what was paid and stamped, not what is being asked.
How many flats are left in The Grand?
80 of 132 were still unsold at the promoter's last filing, in 1, 2 BHK, from 329–619 sq ft of carpet.
Are there complaints against The Grand?
24 cases have been filed with MahaRERA against this project. A complaint is an allegation that has been lodged, not a finding against the promoter.
Who is building The Grand?
Venkateshwara Construction, as the promoter named on the registration.

Check this yourself

This page restates one public record as we read it on 16 September 2026. The authority's own page for P52100017897 carries more that we do not republish: the registration certificate, every quarterly progress report, the sanctioned plans, parking allocation, the project bank account, and any declared litigation.

MahaRERA will ask you to type a CAPTCHA first. That is their gate, not a broken link — and it is the reason this page exists, because a register you have to solve a puzzle to read one project at a time is not one anybody comparing four projects will actually use.

Other projects in Ambegaon Budruk

Stock image, not a photograph of Balaji Siddhi Stock image
Registered here
₹7,032
On offer
1, 2, 3 BHK
Under construction

Balaji Siddhi

Shri Balaji Siddhi Developers · Ambegaon Budruk

43 sold
Slipped 1.6 years
Due
Oct 2027
Units
152
Carpet
484–890
Sold at
₹40.5 lakh
P52100033044